Sample

int-931782e43ccb-I12

Inline all eligible single-use intermediate local variables

Matched original source

Lines49

Scores

MethodScoreScale
Posnett10–1; higher is more readable
Scalabrino0.9860–1; higher is more readable
Dorn0.8350–1; higher is more readable
Mi0.8310–1; higher is more readable
LLOC9Logical lines; fewer is more readable
DeepSeek V4 Pro190–20; mean of three runs
GPT-6.1 Sol200–20; mean of three runs
BTTF0.7090–1; higher is more readable

Views

Source code

package org.springframework.context; /** * Strategy interface for processing Lifecycle beans within the ApplicationContext. * * @author Mark Fisher * @author Juergen Hoeller * @since 3.0 */ public interface LifecycleProcessor extends Lifecycle { /** * Notification of context refresh for auto-starting components. * @see ConfigurableApplicationContext#refresh() */ default void onRefresh() { start(); } /** * Notification of context restart for auto-stopping and subsequently * auto-starting components. * @since 7.0 * @see ConfigurableApplicationContext#restart() */ default void onRestart() { stop(); start(); } /** * Notification of context pause for auto-stopping components. * @since 7.0 * @see ConfigurableApplicationContext#pause() */ default void onPause() { stop(); } /** * Notification of context close phase for auto-stopping components * before destruction. * @see ConfigurableApplicationContext#close() */ default void onClose() { stop(); } }

Loading feature diagnosis…

Source regions

Feature contributions

Feature contributions

FeatureValueContribution
(log-odds)
Source linesThe number of non-empty source lines.49+19.6
Halstead volumeHow much symbolic information the code contains. It combines the total number of operators and values with the number of distinct ones.280.461−9.255
Byte entropyHow varied the bytes in the source text are. Repeated bytes give a lower value; a more even mixture gives a higher value.4.795−7.192

Intercept 8.87 + feature contributions = 12.022 (log-odds).
Score = sigmoid(12.022) = 1.

Score0.986

Feature contributions

FeatureValueContribution
(log-odds)
Comment layout frequencyHow frequently the layout switches between lines containing only comments or whitespace and lines containing code.46−0.592
Operator visual areaThe share of the code’s visual area occupied by operators such as +, =, and *.0.036+0.59
Comment layout (horizontal)How rapidly the visual pattern of comment characters changes from left to right.82.94+0.534
Number layout frequencyHow rapidly the number of numeric values per line changes through the code.1+0.398
Identifier layout (vertical)How rapidly the visual pattern of identifier characters changes from top to bottom.48.595+0.269
Indentation frequencyHow rapidly indentation changes from line to line.27+0.197
Identifier layout (horizontal)How rapidly the visual pattern of identifier characters changes from left to right. It measures spatial frequency, not the meaning of the names.82.94+0.152

Intercept 0.07 + feature contributions = 1.618 (log-odds).
Score = sigmoid(1.618) = 0.835.

Score0.831
Score9
Run 1

This code is exceptionally readable. It defines a clear, single-purpose interface with well-named methods and comprehensive Javadoc. The structure is logical, moving from general lifecycle methods to specific context event notifications. Nesting is non-existent, contributing to a flat, easily scannable layout. Intent is unambiguous; each method name (onRefresh, onRestart, onPause, onClose) clearly describes its trigger and aligns with its one-line body. Code length is minimal yet complete, with no redundancy. Each action (stop() or start()) is on its own line, promoting clarity. The reading flow is natural, mirroring the likely lifecycle sequence: refresh, restart, pause, close. The use of default methods provides sensible default behavior while allowing customization, and documentation concisely explains each method's purpose and links to relevant context methods.

Run 2

The code is highly readable. It has a clear, logical structure defined by a single interface with well-separated default methods. Nesting is minimal, limited to the interface body. Each method's intent is explicitly clarified through descriptive names and Javadoc comments, making the purpose unambiguous. The code is concise with no unnecessary boilerplate. Action granularity is excellent, with each default method containing one or two clear actions on separate lines. The reading flow is natural, moving from the interface declaration through logically ordered lifecycle methods. Overall, this is an exemplary piece of readable Java code.

Run 3

The code is highly readable. It follows a clear, logical structure as a Spring interface with well-documented lifecycle methods. Nesting is nonexistent, with all methods at the top level. The intent of each method is evident from its name and Javadoc. The code is concise yet complete, with each method containing one or two clear actions per line. The reading flow is natural, guided by descriptive naming and consistent Javadoc conventions.

Run 1

Code Structure: A focused interface organizes lifecycle callbacks logically. Nesting: Methods are flat, with no conditional or loop nesting. Clarity of intent: Descriptive method names and concise Javadoc clearly explain each callback; onRestart explicitly stops before starting. Code length: The implementation is brief, with documentation providing useful context rather than unnecessary verbosity. Action granularity: Each statement performs one lifecycle action on its own line. Reading flow: Consistent formatting and the refresh, restart, pause, close ordering make the code easy to follow.

Run 2

Code Structure: A focused interface logically groups lifecycle callbacks. Nesting: Methods are flat, with no conditional or loop nesting. Clarity of intent: Descriptive method names and concise Javadoc clearly explain each callback, while inherited start() and stop() operations are straightforward. Code length: The implementation is concise; documentation adds useful context without unnecessary complexity. Action granularity: Each statement performs one action, and onRestart() explicitly separates stopping from starting. Reading flow: Consistent formatting and the refresh, restart, pause, close ordering make the lifecycle behavior easy to follow.

Run 3

Code Structure: The interface logically groups lifecycle callbacks with consistent formatting and documentation. Nesting: Methods are flat, with no conditional branches or loops. Clarity of intent: Descriptive method names and Javadoc clearly explain each callback; onRestart explicitly stops and then starts components. Code length: The implementation is concise, and documentation adds useful context without unnecessary complexity. Action granularity: Each statement performs exactly one action on its own line. Reading flow: Methods follow a natural refresh, restart, pause, and close sequence, making the interface easy to scan and understand.