Sample

int-579ad1da43e1-SRC

Unmodified source class

Lines49

Scores

MethodScoreScale
Posnett10–1; higher is more readable
Scalabrino0.9860–1; higher is more readable
Dorn0.8350–1; higher is more readable
Mi0.8310–1; higher is more readable
LLOC9Logical lines; fewer is more readable
DeepSeek V4 Pro190–20; mean of three runs
GPT-6.1 Sol200–20; mean of three runs
BTTF0.7090–1; higher is more readable

Views

Source code

package org.springframework.context; /** * Strategy interface for processing Lifecycle beans within the ApplicationContext. * * @author Mark Fisher * @author Juergen Hoeller * @since 3.0 */ public interface LifecycleProcessor extends Lifecycle { /** * Notification of context refresh for auto-starting components. * @see ConfigurableApplicationContext#refresh() */ default void onRefresh() { start(); } /** * Notification of context restart for auto-stopping and subsequently * auto-starting components. * @since 7.0 * @see ConfigurableApplicationContext#restart() */ default void onRestart() { stop(); start(); } /** * Notification of context pause for auto-stopping components. * @since 7.0 * @see ConfigurableApplicationContext#pause() */ default void onPause() { stop(); } /** * Notification of context close phase for auto-stopping components * before destruction. * @see ConfigurableApplicationContext#close() */ default void onClose() { stop(); } }

Loading feature diagnosis…

Source regions

Feature contributions

Feature contributions

FeatureValueContribution
(log-odds)
Source linesThe number of non-empty source lines.49+19.6
Halstead volumeHow much symbolic information the code contains. It combines the total number of operators and values with the number of distinct ones.280.461−9.255
Byte entropyHow varied the bytes in the source text are. Repeated bytes give a lower value; a more even mixture gives a higher value.4.795−7.192

Intercept 8.87 + feature contributions = 12.022 (log-odds).
Score = sigmoid(12.022) = 1.

Score0.986

Feature contributions

FeatureValueContribution
(log-odds)
Comment layout frequencyHow frequently the layout switches between lines containing only comments or whitespace and lines containing code.46−0.592
Operator visual areaThe share of the code’s visual area occupied by operators such as +, =, and *.0.036+0.59
Comment layout (horizontal)How rapidly the visual pattern of comment characters changes from left to right.82.94+0.534
Number layout frequencyHow rapidly the number of numeric values per line changes through the code.1+0.398
Identifier layout (vertical)How rapidly the visual pattern of identifier characters changes from top to bottom.48.595+0.269
Indentation frequencyHow rapidly indentation changes from line to line.27+0.197
Identifier layout (horizontal)How rapidly the visual pattern of identifier characters changes from left to right. It measures spatial frequency, not the meaning of the names.82.94+0.152

Intercept 0.07 + feature contributions = 1.618 (log-odds).
Score = sigmoid(1.618) = 0.835.

Score0.831
Score9
Run 1

This interface demonstrates excellent readability. The structure is logical, with a clear package declaration and well-organized method definitions. Nesting is non-existent since these are top-level default methods. Each method has a clear intent — e.g., onRefresh() calls start(), onRestart() stops then starts — and the Javadocs further clarify purpose and context. Code length is concise: no redundant logic or boilerplate. Action granularity is appropriate, with one meaningful action per line (e.g., stop(); start();). Reading flow is natural, moving from refresh to restart to pause to close, mirroring a lifecycle sequence. The only minor deduction is that some methods (onPause, onClose) have identical bodies, but this is acceptable for semantic clarity and API contract documentation.

Run 2

The code is a clean, well-structured interface with clear intent. It uses default methods to provide lifecycle hooks (onRefresh, onRestart, onPause, onClose) that delegate to start()/stop(), keeping each method flat and concise. Each action (start or stop) is on its own line, improving readability. Javadoc explains each method's purpose, context trigger, and version, aiding maintainers. There is no nesting, and the reading flow is natural—refresh, restart, pause, close—matching the ApplicationContext lifecycle. Overall, the code is highly readable and follows good practices.

Run 3

This code demonstrates excellent readability. The structure is logical: a simple interface extending Lifecycle with clear, single-purpose default methods. There is no nesting or branching, keeping the control flow completely flat. The intent is explicit — each method's name and Javadoc clearly describe its lifecycle hook purpose. The code is concise, with no unnecessary boilerplate. Each method contains only one or two simple calls, maintaining clean action granularity. The reading flow is natural, progressing from refresh through restart, pause, to close, mirroring a standard lifecycle sequence. Minor deductions are only for the absence of import details and a slight redundancy in stop()/start() calls across methods, but these do not meaningfully impact readability.

Run 1

Code Structure: A focused interface groups lifecycle callbacks in a logical order. Nesting: Methods are flat, with no conditional or nested control flow. Clarity of intent: Descriptive method names and concise Javadoc explain each callback, while start() and stop() make behavior explicit. Code length: The implementation is compact, with documentation that adds useful context rather than unnecessary verbosity. Action granularity: Each statement performs one action; onRestart() clearly separates stopping from starting. Reading flow: Consistent formatting and the refresh, restart, pause, and close sequence make the code easy to scan and understand.

Run 2

Code Structure: A small, logically organized interface groups lifecycle callbacks coherently. Nesting: Methods are flat, with no nested control flow. Clarity of intent: Descriptive method names and concise Javadoc clearly explain each callback; inheritance establishes the lifecycle contract. Code length: The implementation is concise, with documentation adding useful context rather than unnecessary bulk. Action granularity: Each statement performs one action, and restart explicitly separates stopping from starting. Reading flow: Consistent formatting and the refresh, restart, pause, close sequence make the code easy to scan and understand.

Run 3

Code Structure: The interface logically groups lifecycle callbacks with consistent documentation and formatting. Nesting: Methods are flat, with no conditional or loop nesting. Clarity of intent: Descriptive method names and Javadoc clearly explain each callback; onRestart explicitly stops before starting. Code length: The implementation is concise, and the documentation adds useful context without unnecessary complexity. Action granularity: Each executable line performs exactly one action. Reading flow: Callbacks follow a natural lifecycle sequence—refresh, restart, pause, and close—making the code easy to scan and understand.