Sample

int-0166ff1bd173-I06

Invert eligible conditions and exchange their branches

Matched original source

Lines49

Scores

MethodScoreScale
Posnett10–1; higher is more readable
Scalabrino0.9860–1; higher is more readable
Dorn0.8350–1; higher is more readable
Mi0.8310–1; higher is more readable
LLOC9Logical lines; fewer is more readable
DeepSeek V4 Pro190–20; mean of three runs
GPT-6.1 Sol200–20; mean of three runs
BTTF0.7090–1; higher is more readable

Views

Source code

package org.springframework.context; /** * Strategy interface for processing Lifecycle beans within the ApplicationContext. * * @author Mark Fisher * @author Juergen Hoeller * @since 3.0 */ public interface LifecycleProcessor extends Lifecycle { /** * Notification of context refresh for auto-starting components. * @see ConfigurableApplicationContext#refresh() */ default void onRefresh() { start(); } /** * Notification of context restart for auto-stopping and subsequently * auto-starting components. * @since 7.0 * @see ConfigurableApplicationContext#restart() */ default void onRestart() { stop(); start(); } /** * Notification of context pause for auto-stopping components. * @since 7.0 * @see ConfigurableApplicationContext#pause() */ default void onPause() { stop(); } /** * Notification of context close phase for auto-stopping components * before destruction. * @see ConfigurableApplicationContext#close() */ default void onClose() { stop(); } }

Loading feature diagnosis…

Source regions

Feature contributions

Feature contributions

FeatureValueContribution
(log-odds)
Source linesThe number of non-empty source lines.49+19.6
Halstead volumeHow much symbolic information the code contains. It combines the total number of operators and values with the number of distinct ones.280.461−9.255
Byte entropyHow varied the bytes in the source text are. Repeated bytes give a lower value; a more even mixture gives a higher value.4.795−7.192

Intercept 8.87 + feature contributions = 12.022 (log-odds).
Score = sigmoid(12.022) = 1.

Score0.986

Feature contributions

FeatureValueContribution
(log-odds)
Comment layout frequencyHow frequently the layout switches between lines containing only comments or whitespace and lines containing code.46−0.592
Operator visual areaThe share of the code’s visual area occupied by operators such as +, =, and *.0.036+0.59
Comment layout (horizontal)How rapidly the visual pattern of comment characters changes from left to right.82.94+0.534
Number layout frequencyHow rapidly the number of numeric values per line changes through the code.1+0.398
Identifier layout (vertical)How rapidly the visual pattern of identifier characters changes from top to bottom.48.595+0.269
Indentation frequencyHow rapidly indentation changes from line to line.27+0.197
Identifier layout (horizontal)How rapidly the visual pattern of identifier characters changes from left to right. It measures spatial frequency, not the meaning of the names.82.94+0.152

Intercept 0.07 + feature contributions = 1.618 (log-odds).
Score = sigmoid(1.618) = 0.835.

Score0.831
Score9
Run 1

This code is exceptionally readable. It defines a clear, single-purpose interface with well-named methods and comprehensive Javadoc. The structure is logical, moving from general lifecycle methods to specific context event notifications. Nesting is non-existent, contributing to a flat, easily scannable layout. Intent is unambiguous; each method name (onRefresh, onRestart, onPause, onClose) clearly describes its trigger and aligns with its one-line body. Code length is minimal yet complete, with no redundancy. Each action (stop() or start()) is on its own line, promoting clarity. The reading flow is natural, mirroring the likely lifecycle sequence: refresh, restart, pause, close. The use of default methods provides sensible default behavior while allowing customization, and documentation concisely explains each method's purpose and links to relevant context methods.

Run 2

The code is exceptionally readable. It has a clear, logical structure as an interface extending Lifecycle, with four self-explanatory default methods. Nesting is minimal to non-existent. Each method's intent is unambiguous, reinforced by concise Javadoc comments. The code length is minimal, avoiding unnecessary verbosity. Each method contains only one or two actions, maintaining a clean action granularity. The reading flow is natural, presenting methods in a logical lifecycle sequence: refresh, restart, pause, close.

Run 3

The code is highly readable. It has a clear, logical structure with well-documented methods. Nesting is minimal, and each method precisely expresses its intent through concise, single-action lines. The reading flow is natural, following lifecycle events in a logical order. The primary deduction is minor verbosity from the extensive Javadoc, though this is standard and often necessary for framework interfaces.

Run 1

Code Structure: The interface is logically organized around distinct lifecycle events. Nesting: Methods are flat, with no nested control flow. Clarity of intent: Descriptive method names and focused Javadoc clearly explain each callback, while restart explicitly stops then starts components. Code length: The implementation is concise, and documentation adds useful context without unnecessary detail. Action granularity: Each executable line performs a single action. Reading flow: Consistent formatting and the refresh, restart, pause, close sequence make the code easy to scan and understand.

Run 2

Code Structure: A small, logically organized interface groups related lifecycle callbacks. Nesting: Methods are flat, with no conditional or loop nesting. Clarity of intent: Descriptive method names and focused Javadoc clearly explain each callback; inheritance establishes the lifecycle contract. Code length: The implementation is concise, and documentation provides useful context without unnecessary complexity. Action granularity: Each statement performs exactly one action, making the stop-then-start sequence in onRestart explicit. Reading flow: Consistent formatting and the refresh, restart, pause, close ordering make the interface easy to scan and understand.

Run 3

Code Structure: A focused interface organizes lifecycle callbacks logically. Nesting: Methods have flat bodies with no conditional or loop nesting. Clarity of intent: Descriptive method names and concise Javadoc clearly explain each callback, with links to relevant context operations. Code length: The implementation is concise, and documentation adds useful context rather than unnecessary verbosity. Action granularity: Each statement performs one action; restart explicitly separates stopping and starting. Reading flow: Consistent formatting and the refresh, restart, pause, and close sequence make the interface easy to follow.