Sample

pyint-c79e121e4e51-I01

Remove comments and docstrings

Matched original source

Lines31

Scores

MethodScoreScale
Posnett00–1; higher is more readable
Dorn0.6230–1; higher is more readable
Mi0.4670–1; higher is more readable
LLOC23Logical lines; fewer is more readable
DeepSeek V4 Pro170–20; mean of three runs
GPT-6.1 Sol190–20; mean of three runs
BTTF0.6410–1; higher is more readable

Views

Source code

from django.core.cache.backends.base import DEFAULT_TIMEOUT, BaseCache class DummyCache(BaseCache): def __init__(self, host, *args, **kwargs): super().__init__(*args, **kwargs) def add(self, key, value, timeout=DEFAULT_TIMEOUT, version=None): self.make_and_validate_key(key, version=version) return True def get(self, key, default=None, version=None): self.make_and_validate_key(key, version=version) return default def set(self, key, value, timeout=DEFAULT_TIMEOUT, version=None): self.make_and_validate_key(key, version=version) def touch(self, key, timeout=DEFAULT_TIMEOUT, version=None): self.make_and_validate_key(key, version=version) return False def delete(self, key, version=None): self.make_and_validate_key(key, version=version) return False def has_key(self, key, version=None): self.make_and_validate_key(key, version=version) return False def clear(self): pass

Loading feature diagnosis…

Source regions

Feature contributions

Feature contributions

FeatureValueContribution
(log-odds)
Halstead volumeHow much symbolic information the code contains. It combines the total number of operators and values with the number of distinct ones.1173.778−38.735
Source linesThe number of non-empty source lines.31+12.4
Byte entropyHow varied the bytes in the source text are. Repeated bytes give a lower value; a more even mixture gives a higher value.4.692−7.038

Intercept 8.87 + feature contributions = -24.503 (log-odds).
Score = sigmoid(-24.503) = 0.

Feature contributions

FeatureValueContribution
(log-odds)
Comment layout (horizontal)How rapidly the visual pattern of comment characters changes from left to right.0−0.804
Identifier layout (horizontal)How rapidly the visual pattern of identifier characters changes from left to right. It measures spatial frequency, not the meaning of the names.69.906+0.704
Number layout frequencyHow rapidly the number of numeric values per line changes through the code.1+0.398
Comment layout frequencyHow frequently the layout switches between lines containing only comments or whitespace and lines containing code.26+0.116
Indentation frequencyHow rapidly indentation changes from line to line.24+0.093
Operator visual areaThe share of the code’s visual area occupied by operators such as +, =, and *.0.106−0.091
Identifier layout (vertical)How rapidly the visual pattern of identifier characters changes from top to bottom.30.563+0.017

Intercept 0.07 + feature contributions = 0.503 (log-odds).
Score = sigmoid(0.503) = 0.623.

Score0.467
Score23
Run 1

The code is clearly organized and easy to follow. Each method has a single, obvious purpose (e.g., `add`, `get`, `set`), and actions are generally one per line, keeping the flow natural. Nesting is minimal, and the class structure is clean. The repeated call to `make_and_validate_key` is consistent and predictable. The `__init__` method is slightly redundant because it only calls `super` without adding behavior, and the `host` parameter is unused, creating minor ambiguity. However, the code remains concise and readable, with clear intent. The score is slightly reduced from 18 due to the redundant `__init__` and the scattered `return` values that could benefit from minor documentation, but overall it is highly maintainable and understandable.

Run 2

The code is highly readable. It has a clear, logical structure with a single class extending BaseCache. Each method is flat, with no nesting, and performs one primary action. Naming is self-documenting, and the intent of a dummy cache implementation is obvious. Code length is minimal and appropriate, with no unnecessary repetition beyond the required interface. The only minor issue is that `__init__` accepts `host` but ignores it, which slightly obscures intent. Overall, reading flow is natural and consistent.

Run 3

The code is highly readable due to its simple, flat structure and clear intent: it implements a dummy cache backend. Each method performs one logical action—validating the key—and then returns a default value. The nesting is minimal, and the reading flow is natural, with methods ordered logically (add, get, set, touch, delete, has_key, clear). The code is concise but not overly terse; it avoids unnecessary complexity and maintains consistent formatting. Minor deductions are made because some methods have an empty body after validation (e.g., set) with no explicit return, leaving intent slightly implicit. Additionally, the __init__ method adds nothing beyond calling super, which could be omitted for brevity. Overall, the code is easy to follow and maintain.

Run 1

Code Structure: A single, logically organized class groups standard cache operations into small methods. Nesting: Methods are flat, with no nested control flow. Clarity of intent: DummyCache and familiar method names clearly suggest a no-op cache; however, a brief docstring could explain the differing return values and unused parameters. Code length: The implementation is concise, with repetition serving consistent key validation rather than adding unnecessary complexity. Action granularity: Each line performs one action, keeping validation and returns distinct. Reading flow: Consistent signatures, spacing, and method patterns make the class easy to scan from initialization through individual operations to clearing.

Run 2

Code Structure: A single cohesive class organizes cache operations into clearly separated methods. Nesting: Methods are flat, with no nested control flow. Clarity of intent: DummyCache and familiar cache method names convey a no-op backend; a brief docstring could clarify why validation occurs despite no storage and why parameters such as host are unused. Code length: The implementation is concise, with repetition appropriate to the cache interface. Action granularity: Each line performs one clear action. Reading flow: Consistent signatures, spacing, and validation patterns make the code easy to scan from initialization through cache operations.

Run 3

Code Structure: A single, logically organized class with clearly separated cache operations. Nesting: Methods are flat, with no nested control flow. Clarity of intent: DummyCache and familiar method names convey a no-op cache implementation; a short docstring could clarify deliberately unused parameters and return behavior. Code length: Concise, with minimal boilerplate; repeated key validation is appropriate for individual interface methods. Action granularity: Each line performs one action, making behavior easy to scan. Reading flow: Consistent signatures and method bodies create a natural, predictable progression through the cache API.