Sample

pyint-640947d86c52-I11

Split eligible integer literals into pairs of short-named intermediate variables

Matched original source

Lines318

Scores

MethodScoreScale
Posnett00–1; higher is more readable
Dorn0.9560–1; higher is more readable
Mi0.6160–1; higher is more readable
LLOC139Logical lines; fewer is more readable
DeepSeek V4 Pro12.670–20; mean of three runs
GPT-6.1 Sol15.330–20; mean of three runs
BTTF0.2990–1; higher is more readable

Views

Source code

from __future__ import annotations import os import sys import time from collections import OrderedDict from collections.abc import Generator, Mapping, MutableMapping from datetime import timedelta from typing import TYPE_CHECKING, Any, cast from ._internal_utils import to_native_string from ._types import is_prepared as _is_prepared from .adapters import HTTPAdapter from .auth import _basic_auth_str from .compat import cookielib, urljoin, urlparse from .cookies import ( RequestsCookieJar, cookiejar_from_dict, extract_cookies_to_jar, merge_cookies, ) from .exceptions import ( ChunkedEncodingError, ContentDecodingError, InvalidSchema, TooManyRedirects, ) from .hooks import default_hooks, dispatch_hook from .models import ( # noqa: F401 DEFAULT_REDIRECT_LIMIT, REDIRECT_STATI, PreparedRequest, Request, Response, ) from .status_codes import codes from .structures import CaseInsensitiveDict from .utils import ( # noqa: F401 DEFAULT_PORTS, default_headers, get_auth_from_url, get_environ_proxies, get_netrc_auth, requote_uri, resolve_proxies, rewind_body, should_bypass_proxies, # re-export for external consumers to_key_val_list, ) class SessionRedirectMixin: max_redirects: int trust_env: bool cookies: RequestsCookieJar def send(self, request: PreparedRequest, **kwargs: Any) -> Response: ... def get_redirect_target(self, resp: Response) -> str | None: """Receives a Response. Returns a redirect URI or ``None``""" # Due to the nature of how requests processes redirects this method will # be called at least once upon the original response and at least twice # on each subsequent redirect response (if any). # If a custom mixin is used to handle this logic, it may be advantageous # to cache the redirect location onto the response object as a private # attribute. if resp.is_redirect: location = resp.headers["location"] # Currently the underlying http module on py3 decode headers # in latin1, but empirical evidence suggests that latin1 is very # rarely used with non-ASCII characters in HTTP headers. # It is more likely to get UTF8 header rather than latin1. # This causes incorrect handling of UTF8 encoded location headers. # To solve this, we re-encode the location in latin1. location = location.encode("latin1") return to_native_string(location, "utf8") return None def should_strip_auth(self, old_url: str, new_url: str) -> bool: """Decide whether Authorization header should be removed when redirecting""" old_parsed = urlparse(old_url) new_parsed = urlparse(new_url) if old_parsed.hostname != new_parsed.hostname: return True # Special case: allow http -> https redirect when using the standard # ports. This isn't specified by RFC 7235, but is kept to avoid # breaking backwards compatibility with older versions of requests # that allowed any redirects on the same host. a = 40 b = 40 c = 221 d = 222 if ( old_parsed.scheme == "http" and old_parsed.port in ((a + b), None) and new_parsed.scheme == "https" and new_parsed.port in ((c + d), None) ): return False # Handle default port usage corresponding to scheme. changed_port = old_parsed.port != new_parsed.port changed_scheme = old_parsed.scheme != new_parsed.scheme default_port = (DEFAULT_PORTS.get(old_parsed.scheme, None), None) if ( not changed_scheme and old_parsed.port in default_port and new_parsed.port in default_port ): return False # Standard case: root URI must match return changed_port or changed_scheme def resolve_redirects( self, resp: Response, req: PreparedRequest, stream: bool = False, timeout: _t.TimeoutType = None, verify: _t.VerifyType = True, cert: _t.CertType = None, proxies: dict[str, str] | None = None, yield_requests: bool = False, **adapter_kwargs: Any, ) -> Generator[Response, None, None]: """Receives a Response. Returns a generator of Responses or Requests.""" hist: list[Response] = [] # keep track of history url = self.get_redirect_target(resp) previous_fragment = urlparse(req.url).fragment while url: prepared_request = req.copy() # Update history and keep track of redirects. resp.history = hist[:] hist.append(resp) try: resp.content # Consume socket so it can be released except (ChunkedEncodingError, ContentDecodingError, RuntimeError): resp.raw.read(decode_content=False) if len(resp.history) >= self.max_redirects: raise TooManyRedirects( f"Exceeded {self.max_redirects} redirects.", response=resp ) # Release the connection back into the pool. resp.close() # Handle redirection without scheme (see: RFC 1808 Section 4) if url.startswith("//"): parsed_rurl = urlparse(resp.url) url = ":".join([to_native_string(parsed_rurl.scheme), url]) # Normalize url case and attach previous fragment if needed (RFC 7231 7.1.2) parsed = urlparse(url) if parsed.fragment == "" and previous_fragment: parsed = parsed._replace(fragment=previous_fragment) elif parsed.fragment: previous_fragment = parsed.fragment url = parsed.geturl() # Facilitate relative 'location' headers, as allowed by RFC 7231. # (e.g. '/path/to/resource' instead of 'http://domain.tld/path/to/resource') # Compliant with RFC3986, we percent encode the url. if not parsed.netloc: url = urljoin(resp.url, requote_uri(url)) else: url = requote_uri(url) prepared_request.url = to_native_string(url) self.rebuild_method(prepared_request, resp) # https://github.com/psf/requests/issues/1084 if resp.status_code not in ( codes.temporary_redirect, codes.permanent_redirect, ): # https://github.com/psf/requests/issues/3490 purged_headers = ("Content-Length", "Content-Type", "Transfer-Encoding") for header in purged_headers: prepared_request.headers.pop(header, None) prepared_request.body = None headers = prepared_request.headers headers.pop("Cookie", None) # Extract any cookies sent on the response to the cookiejar # in the new request. Because we've mutated our copied prepared # request, use the old one that we haven't yet touched. cookie_jar = cast("CookieJar", prepared_request._cookies) extract_cookies_to_jar(cookie_jar, req, resp.raw) merge_cookies(cookie_jar, self.cookies) prepared_request.prepare_cookies(cookie_jar) # Rebuild auth and proxy information. proxies = self.rebuild_proxies(prepared_request, proxies) self.rebuild_auth(prepared_request, resp) # A failed tell() sets `_body_position` to `object()`. This non-None # value ensures `rewindable` will be True, allowing us to raise an # UnrewindableBodyError, instead of hanging the connection. rewindable = prepared_request._body_position is not None and ( "Content-Length" in headers or "Transfer-Encoding" in headers ) # Attempt to rewind consumed file-like object. if rewindable: rewind_body(prepared_request) # Override the original request. req = prepared_request if yield_requests: yield req # type: ignore[misc] # Internal use only, returns PreparedRequest else: resp = self.send( req, stream=stream, timeout=timeout, verify=verify, cert=cert, proxies=proxies, allow_redirects=False, **adapter_kwargs, ) extract_cookies_to_jar(self.cookies, prepared_request, resp.raw) # extract redirect url, if any, for the next loop url = self.get_redirect_target(resp) yield resp def rebuild_auth( self, prepared_request: PreparedRequest, response: Response ) -> None: """When being redirected we may want to strip authentication from the request to avoid leaking credentials. This method intelligently removes and reapplies authentication where possible to avoid credential loss. """ original_request = response.request assert _is_prepared(original_request) assert _is_prepared(prepared_request) headers = prepared_request.headers original_url = original_request.url url = prepared_request.url if "Authorization" in headers and self.should_strip_auth(original_url, url): # If we get redirected to a new host, we should strip out any # authentication headers. del headers["Authorization"] # .netrc might have more auth for us on our new host. new_auth = get_netrc_auth(url) if self.trust_env else None if new_auth is not None: prepared_request.prepare_auth(new_auth) def rebuild_proxies( self, prepared_request: PreparedRequest, proxies: dict[str, str] | None, ) -> dict[str, str]: """This method re-evaluates the proxy configuration by considering the environment variables. If we are redirected to a URL covered by NO_PROXY, we strip the proxy configuration. Otherwise, we set missing proxy keys for this URL (in case they were stripped by a previous redirect). This method also replaces the Proxy-Authorization header where necessary. :rtype: dict """ assert _is_prepared(prepared_request) headers = prepared_request.headers scheme = urlparse(prepared_request.url).scheme new_proxies = resolve_proxies(prepared_request, proxies, self.trust_env) if "Proxy-Authorization" in headers: del headers["Proxy-Authorization"] try: username, password = get_auth_from_url(new_proxies[scheme]) except KeyError: username, password = None, None # urllib3 handles proxy authorization for us in the standard adapter. # Avoid appending this to TLS tunneled requests where it may be leaked. if not scheme.startswith("https") and username and password: headers["Proxy-Authorization"] = _basic_auth_str(username, password) return new_proxies def rebuild_method( self, prepared_request: PreparedRequest, response: Response ) -> None: """When being redirected we may want to change the method of the request based on certain specs or browser behavior. """ method = prepared_request.method # https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7231#section-6.4.4 if response.status_code == codes.see_other and method != "HEAD": method = "GET" # Do what the browsers do, despite standards... # First, turn 302s into GETs. if response.status_code == codes.found and method != "HEAD": method = "GET" # Second, if a POST is responded to with a 301, turn it into a GET. # This bizarre behaviour is explained in Issue 1704. if response.status_code == codes.moved and method == "POST": method = "GET" prepared_request.method = method

Loading feature diagnosis…

Source regions

Feature contributions

Feature contributions

FeatureValueContribution
(log-odds)
Halstead volumeHow much symbolic information the code contains. It combines the total number of operators and values with the number of distinct ones.9202.25−303.674
Source linesThe number of non-empty source lines.318+127.2
Byte entropyHow varied the bytes in the source text are. Repeated bytes give a lower value; a more even mixture gives a higher value.4.411−6.617

Intercept 8.87 + feature contributions = -174.221 (log-odds).
Score = sigmoid(-174.221) = 0.

Feature contributions

FeatureValueContribution
(log-odds)
Comment layout frequencyHow frequently the layout switches between lines containing only comments or whitespace and lines containing code.319−10.258
Indentation frequencyHow rapidly indentation changes from line to line.250+7.91
Identifier layout (vertical)How rapidly the visual pattern of identifier characters changes from top to bottom.317.851+4.033
Comment layout (horizontal)How rapidly the visual pattern of comment characters changes from left to right.92.969+0.696
Operator visual areaThe share of the code’s visual area occupied by operators such as +, =, and *.0.044+0.51
Number layout frequencyHow rapidly the number of numeric values per line changes through the code.1+0.398
Identifier layout (horizontal)How rapidly the visual pattern of identifier characters changes from left to right. It measures spatial frequency, not the meaning of the names.92.962−0.272

Intercept 0.07 + feature contributions = 3.086 (log-odds).
Score = sigmoid(3.086) = 0.956.

Score0.616
Score139
Run 1

The code demonstrates generally good readability with clear method names, docstrings, and logical organization into a mixin class. However, it has some readability issues: the cryptic variables 'a', 'b', 'c', 'd' in should_strip_auth obscure intent, the resolve_redirects method is quite long with complex branching, and there are unused imports (os, sys, time, OrderedDict, etc.). Try/except blocks and conditional nesting increase cognitive load. Comments are helpful but some sections could be extracted into smaller helper methods. Overall structure is sound but would benefit from refactoring the longer methods and improving variable naming.

Run 2

The code is generally well-structured with clear section separation and descriptive method names. However, readability is hampered by several factors: the 'resolve_redirects' method is excessively long (over 100 lines) and mixes multiple responsibilities like URL normalization, header modification, cookie handling, and request rebuilding, making it hard to follow. Magic numbers (40, 221, 222) in 'should_strip_auth' obscure intent and should be named constants. While nesting is moderate and action granularity is mostly one action per line, the flow jumps between different concerns. Comments are helpful but cannot fully compensate for the monolithic method. Type hints are good, but imports are heavily cluttered with 'noqa' comments. Overall, the code is maintainable for experienced developers familiar with the codebase, but could benefit from refactoring 'resolve_redirects' into smaller, focused helper methods.

Run 3

The code has significant readability issues. While it follows a class-based structure and includes helpful comments, it suffers from several problems: (1) Deep nesting in resolve_redirects with multiple conditional blocks and loops; (2) Obscure variable names like 'a', 'b', 'c', 'd' that compute magic numbers (40+40=80, 221+222=443) instead of using named constants; (3) Long methods exceeding 50-100 lines that mix multiple concerns; (4) Heavy use of type hints and imports that add visual noise; (5) Multiple type ignore comments and noqa comments indicating technical debt; (6) The resolve_redirects method handles too many responsibilities (cookies, auth, proxies, method rebuilding, URL normalization) making it hard to follow; (7) Some code blocks could be extracted into smaller helper methods for better action granularity. The comments are helpful but the overall structure makes it difficult to trace execution flow.

Run 1

Code Structure: Cohesive mixin with well-separated helpers, though resolve_redirects combines many responsibilities. Nesting: Mostly shallow conditionals and early returns; the redirect loop adds moderate nesting without becoming tangled. Clarity of intent: Descriptive method names, type annotations, docstrings, and protocol explanations make behavior understandable. However, a, b, c, and d obscure standard ports through unnecessary arithmetic, and unresolved type references weaken clarity. Code length: Most helpers are concise, but the redirect method is lengthy and some comments are verbose. Action granularity: Statements generally perform one action per line, with useful intermediate variables. Reading flow: Redirect processing follows a logical sequence, supported by whitespace and explanatory comments; cookie handling, authentication, proxy rebuilding, and body rewinding require careful tracking of mutable state.

Run 2

Code Structure: A cohesive redirect-handling mixin separates authentication, proxies, and method changes into focused helpers, although resolve_redirects handles many responsibilities. Nesting: Mostly shallow conditionals and early returns; the main redirect loop adds moderate nesting. Clarity of intent: Descriptive method names, annotations, docstrings, and protocol comments explain behavior well. However, a, b, c, and d obscure standard ports through unnecessary arithmetic, and undefined annotation references such as _t distract readers. Code length: Generally justified by HTTP edge cases, but the lengthy redirect method and some verbose comments could be streamlined. Action granularity: Statements usually perform one action per line, with clearly separated processing stages. Reading flow: Redirect processing follows a logical sequence from response cleanup through URL normalization, cookies, authentication, and sending, though numerous edge cases and state mutations require careful tracking.

Run 3

Code Structure: Related redirect responsibilities are logically grouped in a mixin with focused helper methods, although resolve_redirects combines many concerns. Nesting: Most methods are flat, but the redirect loop contains several conditional branches and exception handling, requiring more effort to follow. Clarity of intent: Descriptive method names, annotations, docstrings, and protocol-specific comments explain most behavior well. However, a, b, c, and d obscure standard ports through unnecessary arithmetic, and undefined annotation references such as _t reduce self-contained clarity. Code length: Most helpers are concise, but resolve_redirects is lengthy and could benefit from extracting URL normalization and request preparation. Action granularity: Statements generally perform one action per line, with no compressed multi-statement lines. Reading flow: Processing follows a sensible redirect lifecycle, supported by whitespace and comments; changing request/response state and numerous edge cases interrupt otherwise natural flow.