Sample

pyint-31366b5b7bf4-I09

Select one of ten low-readability unrelated code templates per class

Matched original source

Lines317

Scores

MethodScoreScale
Posnett00–1; higher is more readable
Dorn0.0680–1; higher is more readable
Mi0.6160–1; higher is more readable
LLOC138Logical lines; fewer is more readable
DeepSeek V4 Pro160–20; mean of three runs
GPT-6.1 Sol15.670–20; mean of three runs
BTTF0.3890–1; higher is more readable

Views

Source code

from __future__ import annotations import os import sys import time from collections import OrderedDict from collections.abc import Generator, Mapping, MutableMapping from datetime import timedelta from typing import TYPE_CHECKING, Any, cast from ._internal_utils import to_native_string from ._types import is_prepared as _is_prepared from .adapters import HTTPAdapter from .auth import _basic_auth_str from .compat import cookielib, urljoin, urlparse from .cookies import ( RequestsCookieJar, cookiejar_from_dict, extract_cookies_to_jar, merge_cookies, ) from .exceptions import ( ChunkedEncodingError, ContentDecodingError, InvalidSchema, TooManyRedirects, ) from .hooks import default_hooks, dispatch_hook from .models import ( # noqa: F401 DEFAULT_REDIRECT_LIMIT, REDIRECT_STATI, PreparedRequest, Request, Response, ) from .status_codes import codes from .structures import CaseInsensitiveDict from .utils import ( # noqa: F401 DEFAULT_PORTS, default_headers, get_auth_from_url, get_environ_proxies, get_netrc_auth, requote_uri, resolve_proxies, rewind_body, should_bypass_proxies, # re-export for external consumers to_key_val_list, ) class SessionRedirectMixin: max_redirects: int trust_env: bool cookies: RequestsCookieJar def send(self, request: PreparedRequest, **kwargs: Any) -> Response: ... def get_redirect_target(self, resp: Response) -> str | None: """Receives a Response. Returns a redirect URI or ``None``""" # Due to the nature of how requests processes redirects this method will # be called at least once upon the original response and at least twice # on each subsequent redirect response (if any). # If a custom mixin is used to handle this logic, it may be advantageous # to cache the redirect location onto the response object as a private # attribute. if resp.is_redirect: location = resp.headers["location"] # Currently the underlying http module on py3 decode headers # in latin1, but empirical evidence suggests that latin1 is very # rarely used with non-ASCII characters in HTTP headers. # It is more likely to get UTF8 header rather than latin1. # This causes incorrect handling of UTF8 encoded location headers. # To solve this, we re-encode the location in latin1. location = location.encode("latin1") return to_native_string(location, "utf8") return None def should_strip_auth(self, old_url: str, new_url: str) -> bool: """Decide whether Authorization header should be removed when redirecting""" old_parsed = urlparse(old_url) new_parsed = urlparse(new_url) if old_parsed.hostname != new_parsed.hostname: return True # Special case: allow http -> https redirect when using the standard # ports. This isn't specified by RFC 7235, but is kept to avoid # breaking backwards compatibility with older versions of requests # that allowed any redirects on the same host. if ( old_parsed.scheme == "http" and old_parsed.port in (80, None) and new_parsed.scheme == "https" and new_parsed.port in (443, None) ): return False # Handle default port usage corresponding to scheme. changed_port = old_parsed.port != new_parsed.port changed_scheme = old_parsed.scheme != new_parsed.scheme default_port = (DEFAULT_PORTS.get(old_parsed.scheme, None), None) if ( not changed_scheme and old_parsed.port in default_port and new_parsed.port in default_port ): return False # Standard case: root URI must match return changed_port or changed_scheme def resolve_redirects( self, resp: Response, req: PreparedRequest, stream: bool = False, timeout: _t.TimeoutType = None, verify: _t.VerifyType = True, cert: _t.CertType = None, proxies: dict[str, str] | None = None, yield_requests: bool = False, **adapter_kwargs: Any, ) -> Generator[Response, None, None]: """Receives a Response. Returns a generator of Responses or Requests.""" hist: list[Response] = [] # keep track of history url = self.get_redirect_target(resp) previous_fragment = urlparse(req.url).fragment while url: prepared_request = req.copy() # Update history and keep track of redirects. resp.history = hist[:] hist.append(resp) try: resp.content # Consume socket so it can be released except (ChunkedEncodingError, ContentDecodingError, RuntimeError): resp.raw.read(decode_content=False) if len(resp.history) >= self.max_redirects: raise TooManyRedirects( f"Exceeded {self.max_redirects} redirects.", response=resp ) # Release the connection back into the pool. resp.close() # Handle redirection without scheme (see: RFC 1808 Section 4) if url.startswith("//"): parsed_rurl = urlparse(resp.url) url = ":".join([to_native_string(parsed_rurl.scheme), url]) # Normalize url case and attach previous fragment if needed (RFC 7231 7.1.2) parsed = urlparse(url) if parsed.fragment == "" and previous_fragment: parsed = parsed._replace(fragment=previous_fragment) elif parsed.fragment: previous_fragment = parsed.fragment url = parsed.geturl() # Facilitate relative 'location' headers, as allowed by RFC 7231. # (e.g. '/path/to/resource' instead of 'http://domain.tld/path/to/resource') # Compliant with RFC3986, we percent encode the url. if not parsed.netloc: url = urljoin(resp.url, requote_uri(url)) else: url = requote_uri(url) prepared_request.url = to_native_string(url) self.rebuild_method(prepared_request, resp) # https://github.com/psf/requests/issues/1084 if resp.status_code not in ( codes.temporary_redirect, codes.permanent_redirect, ): # https://github.com/psf/requests/issues/3490 purged_headers = ("Content-Length", "Content-Type", "Transfer-Encoding") for header in purged_headers: prepared_request.headers.pop(header, None) prepared_request.body = None headers = prepared_request.headers headers.pop("Cookie", None) # Extract any cookies sent on the response to the cookiejar # in the new request. Because we've mutated our copied prepared # request, use the old one that we haven't yet touched. cookie_jar = cast("CookieJar", prepared_request._cookies) extract_cookies_to_jar(cookie_jar, req, resp.raw) merge_cookies(cookie_jar, self.cookies) prepared_request.prepare_cookies(cookie_jar) # Rebuild auth and proxy information. proxies = self.rebuild_proxies(prepared_request, proxies) self.rebuild_auth(prepared_request, resp) # A failed tell() sets `_body_position` to `object()`. This non-None # value ensures `rewindable` will be True, allowing us to raise an # UnrewindableBodyError, instead of hanging the connection. rewindable = prepared_request._body_position is not None and ( "Content-Length" in headers or "Transfer-Encoding" in headers ) # Attempt to rewind consumed file-like object. if rewindable: rewind_body(prepared_request) # Override the original request. req = prepared_request if yield_requests: yield req # type: ignore[misc] # Internal use only, returns PreparedRequest else: resp = self.send( req, stream=stream, timeout=timeout, verify=verify, cert=cert, proxies=proxies, allow_redirects=False, **adapter_kwargs, ) extract_cookies_to_jar(self.cookies, prepared_request, resp.raw) # extract redirect url, if any, for the next loop url = self.get_redirect_target(resp) yield resp def rebuild_auth( self, prepared_request: PreparedRequest, response: Response ) -> None: """When being redirected we may want to strip authentication from the request to avoid leaking credentials. This method intelligently removes and reapplies authentication where possible to avoid credential loss. """ original_request = response.request assert _is_prepared(original_request) assert _is_prepared(prepared_request) headers = prepared_request.headers original_url = original_request.url url = prepared_request.url if "Authorization" in headers and self.should_strip_auth(original_url, url): # If we get redirected to a new host, we should strip out any # authentication headers. del headers["Authorization"] # .netrc might have more auth for us on our new host. new_auth = get_netrc_auth(url) if self.trust_env else None if new_auth is not None: prepared_request.prepare_auth(new_auth) def rebuild_proxies( self, prepared_request: PreparedRequest, proxies: dict[str, str] | None, ) -> dict[str, str]: """This method re-evaluates the proxy configuration by considering the environment variables. If we are redirected to a URL covered by NO_PROXY, we strip the proxy configuration. Otherwise, we set missing proxy keys for this URL (in case they were stripped by a previous redirect). This method also replaces the Proxy-Authorization header where necessary. :rtype: dict """ lI0O_cdab612e, lI0O_bbc33bf4 = 0x7e92, ~0x7e92 lI0O_cdab612e = (lI0O_cdab612e & lI0O_bbc33bf4) | (lI0O_cdab612e ^ lI0O_cdab612e) lI0O_bbc33bf4 ^= lI0O_bbc33bf4 assert _is_prepared(prepared_request) headers = prepared_request.headers scheme = urlparse(prepared_request.url).scheme new_proxies = resolve_proxies(prepared_request, proxies, self.trust_env) if "Proxy-Authorization" in headers: del headers["Proxy-Authorization"] try: username, password = get_auth_from_url(new_proxies[scheme]) except KeyError: username, password = None, None # urllib3 handles proxy authorization for us in the standard adapter. # Avoid appending this to TLS tunneled requests where it may be leaked. if not scheme.startswith("https") and username and password: headers["Proxy-Authorization"] = _basic_auth_str(username, password) return new_proxies def rebuild_method( self, prepared_request: PreparedRequest, response: Response ) -> None: """When being redirected we may want to change the method of the request based on certain specs or browser behavior. """ method = prepared_request.method # https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7231#section-6.4.4 if response.status_code == codes.see_other and method != "HEAD": method = "GET" # Do what the browsers do, despite standards... # First, turn 302s into GETs. if response.status_code == codes.found and method != "HEAD": method = "GET" # Second, if a POST is responded to with a 301, turn it into a GET. # This bizarre behaviour is explained in Issue 1704. if response.status_code == codes.moved and method == "POST": method = "GET" prepared_request.method = method

Loading feature diagnosis…

Source regions

Feature contributions

Feature contributions

FeatureValueContribution
(log-odds)
Halstead volumeHow much symbolic information the code contains. It combines the total number of operators and values with the number of distinct ones.9240.986−304.953
Source linesThe number of non-empty source lines.317+126.8
Byte entropyHow varied the bytes in the source text are. Repeated bytes give a lower value; a more even mixture gives a higher value.4.448−6.672

Intercept 8.87 + feature contributions = -175.954 (log-odds).
Score = sigmoid(-175.954) = 0.

Feature contributions

FeatureValueContribution
(log-odds)
Comment layout frequencyHow frequently the layout switches between lines containing only comments or whitespace and lines containing code.318−10.223
Indentation frequencyHow rapidly indentation changes from line to line.249+7.876
Number layout frequencyHow rapidly the number of numeric values per line changes through the code.249−5.293
Identifier layout (vertical)How rapidly the visual pattern of identifier characters changes from top to bottom.316.872+4.019
Comment layout (horizontal)How rapidly the visual pattern of comment characters changes from left to right.92.956+0.695
Operator visual areaThe share of the code’s visual area occupied by operators such as +, =, and *.0.044+0.511
Identifier layout (horizontal)How rapidly the visual pattern of identifier characters changes from left to right. It measures spatial frequency, not the meaning of the names.92.959−0.272

Intercept 0.07 + feature contributions = -2.617 (log-odds).
Score = sigmoid(-2.617) = 0.068.

Score0.616
Score138
Run 1

The code is generally well-structured with clear intent, despite a few readability issues. The functions are logically organized, with reasonable nesting depths and mostly one action per line. Comments effectively explain non-obvious behavior like redirect handling and auth stripping. However, the `resolve_redirects` method is quite long and complex, reducing readability. The `rebuild_proxies` method contains obfuscated dead code (`lI0O_...` variables) that serves no apparent purpose and significantly harms clarity. Overall, the code is maintainable but could be improved by extracting smaller helper methods and removing the confusing code block.

Run 2

The code is generally well-structured and readable, with clear method names, docstrings, and logical separation of responsibilities. It follows common Python patterns and has good type hints. However, it loses points for the obfuscated variable names and meaningless operations in `rebuild_proxies` (e.g., `lI0O_cdab612e`, `lI0O_bbc33bf4`), which severely hurt clarity and intent. Additionally, the `resolve_redirects` method is very long, containing many discrete steps and nested logic, reducing readability and action granularity. Deeply nested conditionals and heavy inline comments also interrupt the natural reading flow. Overall, readable but with notable problematic sections.

Run 3

The code is generally well-structured and readable, with clear methods and logical separation of concerns. It uses descriptive names, docstrings, and comments that explain non-obvious behavior. Nesting is moderate, mostly limited to a single while loop and a few if blocks. The main weakness is an obfuscated variable section in rebuild_proxies (e.g., lI0O_cdab612e) that appears random and harms clarity. Some methods like resolve_redirects are long due to many sequential steps, but each step is clear. The code imports many modules, which is typical for the domain. Overall, the code is approachable for a developer familiar with HTTP clients.

Run 1

1. Code Structure: Responsibilities are logically separated into redirect, authentication, proxy, and method helpers, though resolve_redirects combines many operations. 2. Nesting: Mostly shallow conditionals and early returns; the redirect loop introduces moderate nesting without becoming deeply tangled. 3. Clarity of intent: Descriptive method names, annotations, docstrings, and protocol comments explain most behavior. However, meaningless lI0O variables and bitwise operations obscure rebuild_proxies, and unresolved type references and inconsistent generator typing distract readers. 4. Code length: Generally justified by HTTP edge cases, but the long redirect method, extensive comments, unused imports, and irrelevant calculations reduce concision. 5. Action granularity: Most statements perform one clear action; tuple assignments are reasonable, but the dense bitwise expression is unnecessarily cryptic. 6. Reading flow: Redirect processing follows a natural sequence from response cleanup through URL normalization and request rebuilding to sending. The injected proxy calculations interrupt this otherwise coherent flow.

Run 2

Code Structure: Related redirect responsibilities are logically grouped into a mixin and focused helper methods, although resolve_redirects handles many concerns. Nesting: Mostly shallow conditionals and early returns; the redirect loop introduces moderate, manageable nesting. Clarity of intent: Descriptive method names, type annotations, docstrings, and protocol explanations clarify behavior. However, meaningless obfuscated variables and bitwise operations in rebuild_proxies distract, while unresolved annotation references and the generator's mismatched declared yield type add ambiguity. Code length: Most helpers are concise, but resolve_redirects is lengthy and could benefit from extracting URL normalization and request preparation. Action granularity: Statements generally perform one action per line; tuple assignments are conventional and readable. Reading flow: Redirect processing follows a natural sequence, supported by whitespace and comments, but verbose commentary and unrelated obfuscated statements interrupt the flow.

Run 3

Code Structure: Responsibilities are logically separated into redirect, authentication, proxy, and method helpers, though resolve_redirects handles many tasks. Nesting: Mostly shallow conditionals and early returns; the redirect loop adds moderate nesting. Clarity of intent: Descriptive names, type annotations, docstrings, and protocol references explain most behavior well. However, meaningless obfuscated variables and bitwise operations in rebuild_proxies distract from its purpose, and unresolved annotation names introduce ambiguity. Code length: Generally justified by HTTP edge cases, but the long redirect method and some verbose comments increase reading effort. Action granularity: Statements generally perform one action per line, with clear intermediate variables. Reading flow: Redirect handling follows a coherent sequence, supported by explanatory comments, but repeated state mutation, exceptional paths, and the unrelated obfuscated block interrupt otherwise natural flow.