Sample
pyint-af2ebddc7288-I05
Rewrite eligible decimal integer literals in hexadecimal notation
Scores
| Method | Score | Scale |
|---|---|---|
| Posnett | 0.02 | 0–1; higher is more readable |
| Dorn | 0.858 | 0–1; higher is more readable |
| Mi | 0.584 | 0–1; higher is more readable |
| LLOC | 22 | Logical lines; fewer is more readable |
| DeepSeek V4 Pro | 17.33 | 0–20; mean of three runs |
| GPT-6.1 Sol | 18 | 0–20; mean of three runs |
| BTTF | 0.747 | 0–1; higher is more readable |
Views
Loading feature diagnosis…
Source regions
Feature contributions
Feature contributions
| Feature | Value | Contribution (log-odds) |
|---|---|---|
| Halstead volumeHow much symbolic information the code contains. It combines the total number of operators and values with the number of distinct ones. | 696.883 | −22.997 |
| Source linesThe number of non-empty source lines. | 43 | +17.2 |
| Byte entropyHow varied the bytes in the source text are. Repeated bytes give a lower value; a more even mixture gives a higher value. | 4.653 | −6.979 |
Intercept 8.87 + feature contributions = -3.906 (log-odds).
Score = sigmoid(-3.906) = 0.02.
Feature contributions
| Feature | Value | Contribution (log-odds) |
|---|---|---|
| Operator visual areaThe share of the code’s visual area occupied by operators such as +, =, and *. | 0.026 | +0.69 |
| Comment layout frequencyHow frequently the layout switches between lines containing only comments or whitespace and lines containing code. | 44 | −0.522 |
| Number layout frequencyHow rapidly the number of numeric values per line changes through the code. | 1 | +0.398 |
| Comment layout (horizontal)How rapidly the visual pattern of comment characters changes from left to right. | 73.795 | +0.386 |
| Identifier layout (horizontal)How rapidly the visual pattern of identifier characters changes from left to right. It measures spatial frequency, not the meaning of the names. | 78.909 | +0.323 |
| Indentation frequencyHow rapidly indentation changes from line to line. | 29 | +0.266 |
| Identifier layout (vertical)How rapidly the visual pattern of identifier characters changes from top to bottom. | 42.875 | +0.189 |
Intercept 0.07 + feature contributions = 1.801 (log-odds).
Score = sigmoid(1.801) = 0.858.
| Score | 0.584 |
|---|
| Score | 22 |
|---|
Run 1
The code is well-structured with clear class definition and logical grouping of properties and attributes. Nesting is minimal—only one class and no deep indentation. The intent is clear: extending a dictionary with session-specific behavior. Code length is concise; each property is short and focused. Action granularity is appropriate, with one logical action per line. Reading flow is natural, moving from imports to class definition to documented attributes. Type hints and docstrings improve understandability. Minor deductions include a couple of slightly long lines and mixed import styles, but overall readability is strong.
Run 2
The code demonstrates excellent readability with clear structure and intent. The SessionMixin class is logically organized with properties and attributes properly separated. Nesting is minimal - only one class and two methods with no deep indentation. The intent is clearly expressed through descriptive naming and comprehensive docstrings that explain not just what each component does but also important caveats. Code length is appropriate with no unnecessary verbosity, though the multiline docstring for 'accessed' is slightly long but justified given the version change reference. Each line performs a single clear action. Reading flow is natural - imports are properly grouped, class purpose is immediately evident, and methods follow a logical progression. The type hints and explicit return type annotations enhance clarity. Minor deductions for the type ignore comment and the slight inconsistency in docstring formatting between attributes, but overall this is production-quality readable code.
Run 3
The code is highly readable with clear structure and purpose. It defines a SessionMixin class with well-documented properties and attributes. The 'permanent' property demonstrates good encapsulation with a getter/setter pattern and clear docstrings. Nesting is minimal, and action granularity is appropriate - each method or property does one thing. The reading flow is natural, starting with imports, then class definition, followed by properties and attributes. The use of type hints and docstrings enhances clarity. Minor deductions: some attributes like 'new' and 'modified' lack type annotations, and the 'accessed' attribute has a multi-line docstring that slightly breaks the flow between 'modified' and 'accessed'. However, overall the code follows Python best practices and remains concise.
Run 1
Code Structure: Imports and a focused session mixin are logically organized, though import grouping could be clearer. Nesting: Minimal nesting makes the code easy to scan. Clarity of intent: Descriptive names, type annotations, and documentation clearly explain session attributes and the permanent property; abbreviated import aliases slightly reduce immediate clarity. Code length: The implementation is concise, with proportionate documentation, although several imports are unused in the shown snippet. Action granularity: Each statement performs a single action, with no compressed multi-operation lines. Reading flow: The progression from the class description to the property and session flags is natural. Minor inconsistencies in attribute documentation styles and limited spacing between import groups slightly interrupt an otherwise clear presentation.
Run 2
Code Structure: Imports and session-related behavior are logically grouped within a focused mixin, although import grouping could be cleaner. Nesting: Minimal nesting makes the code easy to scan. Clarity of intent: Descriptive property names, type annotations, and documentation clearly explain session behavior; abbreviated import aliases and differing comment styles slightly reduce clarity. Code length: The implementation is concise, with documentation providing useful context rather than unnecessary complexity, though several imports are unused in this excerpt. Action granularity: Each executable line performs a single clear action. Reading flow: The progression from the permanent property to session-state flags is natural, but inconsistent documentation placement and formatting introduce minor interruptions.
Run 3
Code Structure: Imports and a single focused mixin are logically organized, although import grouping could be clearer. Nesting: Minimal nesting, limited to straightforward property methods. Clarity of intent: Descriptive names, type annotations, and documentation clearly explain session attributes; abbreviated import aliases slightly reduce clarity. Code length: Concise implementation, with documentation appropriately explaining behavioral caveats, though several imports are unused in this snippet. Action granularity: Each executable line performs one clear action. Reading flow: The getter, setter, and default attributes follow naturally, but inconsistent documentation styles and embedded version metadata mildly interrupt the flow.