Sample
pyint-80a1d7e7312f-I13
Lower every eligible synchronous for loop to a while loop
Scores
| Method | Score | Scale |
|---|---|---|
| Posnett | 0.03 | 0–1; higher is more readable |
| Dorn | 0.778 | 0–1; higher is more readable |
| Mi | 0.43 | 0–1; higher is more readable |
| LLOC | 9 | Logical lines; fewer is more readable |
| DeepSeek V4 Pro | 17 | 0–20; mean of three runs |
| GPT-6.1 Sol | 18 | 0–20; mean of three runs |
| BTTF | 0.601 | 0–1; higher is more readable |
Views
Loading feature diagnosis…
Source regions
Feature contributions
Feature contributions
| Feature | Value | Contribution (log-odds) |
|---|---|---|
| Halstead volumeHow much symbolic information the code contains. It combines the total number of operators and values with the number of distinct ones. | 379.567 | −12.526 |
| Source linesThe number of non-empty source lines. | 18 | +7.2 |
| Byte entropyHow varied the bytes in the source text are. Repeated bytes give a lower value; a more even mixture gives a higher value. | 4.684 | −7.026 |
Intercept 8.87 + feature contributions = -3.482 (log-odds).
Score = sigmoid(-3.482) = 0.03.
Feature contributions
| Feature | Value | Contribution (log-odds) |
|---|---|---|
| Operator visual areaThe share of the code’s visual area occupied by operators such as +, =, and *. | 0.043 | +0.525 |
| Identifier layout (horizontal)How rapidly the visual pattern of identifier characters changes from left to right. It measures spatial frequency, not the meaning of the names. | 77.947 | +0.364 |
| Comment layout frequencyHow frequently the layout switches between lines containing only comments or whitespace and lines containing code. | 19 | +0.364 |
| Indentation frequencyHow rapidly indentation changes from line to line. | 13 | −0.287 |
| Comment layout (horizontal)How rapidly the visual pattern of comment characters changes from left to right. | 65.737 | +0.256 |
| Identifier layout (vertical)How rapidly the visual pattern of identifier characters changes from top to bottom. | 17.797 | −0.161 |
| Number layout frequencyHow rapidly the number of numeric values per line changes through the code. | 13 | +0.123 |
Intercept 0.07 + feature contributions = 1.252 (log-odds).
Score = sigmoid(1.252) = 0.778.
| Score | 0.43 |
|---|
| Score | 9 |
|---|
Run 1
The code is concise, with clear intent and logical structure. Each method performs a single action, and nesting is minimal. The class docstring effectively explains the purpose and extension mechanism. However, readability is slightly reduced because the GeoRSSFeed class and _get_dynamic_attr method are not shown, requiring some Django-specific context to fully understand the implementation.
Run 2
The code is highly readable due to its clear structure, minimal nesting, and concise implementation. The class docstring clearly explains the purpose and expected subclass behavior. Each method has a single responsibility and returns a clean dictionary, demonstrating good action granularity. The use of `_get_dynamic_attr` is consistent with Django's Feed API and the intent is unambiguous. The code is short, flat, and flows naturally from class definition to specialized methods. Minor deduction only for the slightly vague reference to GeoRSSFeed, which is not defined in this snippet.
Run 3
The code is clear and well-structured. It defines a Feed subclass with a concise docstring explaining its purpose, and each method performs a single, clearly named action. Nesting is minimal, and the reading flow is natural: class definition, then feed-level extra kwargs, then item-level. The logic is compact with no unnecessary code. Minor points: the class inherits from BaseFeed but uses 'Feed' as its name, which could be slightly ambiguous, and the docstring could mention inheritance more explicitly. Overall, readability is high.
Run 1
Code Structure: The subclass is logically organized, with a class-level setting followed by two related overrides. Nesting: Minimal nesting makes the code easy to scan. Clarity of intent: Descriptive method names and the docstring explain the geometry extension, though GeoRSSFeed is not defined or imported in the snippet, and the docstring contains a minor grammatical error. Code length: The implementation is concise without unnecessary logic. Action granularity: Each method performs one clear return operation, with no crowded statements. Reading flow: Imports, documentation, configuration, and methods follow a natural order; slightly more spacing around the class declaration would improve presentation.
Run 2
Code Structure: A logically organized subclass groups two closely related feed customization methods. Nesting: Minimal nesting makes the code easy to scan. Clarity of intent: Descriptive method names and a helpful docstring explain the geometry extension, though GeoRSSFeed is not defined or imported in the snippet, and the visible feed-generator imports are unused. Code length: Concise, with little unnecessary code. Action granularity: Each method performs a single clear return operation, with no crowded statements. Reading flow: Imports, class documentation, configuration, and methods follow a natural order. Minor docstring grammatical issues and the missing GeoRSSFeed context slightly reduce readability.
Run 3
Code Structure: The subclass is logically organized, with a configuration attribute followed by two related methods. Nesting: Methods are flat and easy to follow. Clarity of intent: Descriptive method names and the docstring explain the geometry extension, though GeoRSSFeed is not defined or imported in the snippet, and the docstring has minor grammatical issues. Code length: The implementation is concise, but the unused Atom1Feed and Rss201rev2Feed imports add clutter. Action granularity: Each return statement performs one clear operation without combining unrelated actions. Reading flow: The progression from imports to class documentation, configuration, and methods is natural; additional spacing before the class would improve formatting.