Sample
pyint-ce3966227224-I06
Invert eligible conditions and exchange their branches
Scores
| Method | Score | Scale |
|---|---|---|
| Posnett | 0.03 | 0–1; higher is more readable |
| Dorn | 0.778 | 0–1; higher is more readable |
| Mi | 0.43 | 0–1; higher is more readable |
| LLOC | 9 | Logical lines; fewer is more readable |
| DeepSeek V4 Pro | 16.67 | 0–20; mean of three runs |
| GPT-6.1 Sol | 18 | 0–20; mean of three runs |
| BTTF | 0.601 | 0–1; higher is more readable |
Views
Loading feature diagnosis…
Source regions
Feature contributions
Feature contributions
| Feature | Value | Contribution (log-odds) |
|---|---|---|
| Halstead volumeHow much symbolic information the code contains. It combines the total number of operators and values with the number of distinct ones. | 379.567 | −12.526 |
| Source linesThe number of non-empty source lines. | 18 | +7.2 |
| Byte entropyHow varied the bytes in the source text are. Repeated bytes give a lower value; a more even mixture gives a higher value. | 4.684 | −7.026 |
Intercept 8.87 + feature contributions = -3.482 (log-odds).
Score = sigmoid(-3.482) = 0.03.
Feature contributions
| Feature | Value | Contribution (log-odds) |
|---|---|---|
| Operator visual areaThe share of the code’s visual area occupied by operators such as +, =, and *. | 0.043 | +0.525 |
| Identifier layout (horizontal)How rapidly the visual pattern of identifier characters changes from left to right. It measures spatial frequency, not the meaning of the names. | 77.947 | +0.364 |
| Comment layout frequencyHow frequently the layout switches between lines containing only comments or whitespace and lines containing code. | 19 | +0.364 |
| Indentation frequencyHow rapidly indentation changes from line to line. | 13 | −0.287 |
| Comment layout (horizontal)How rapidly the visual pattern of comment characters changes from left to right. | 65.737 | +0.256 |
| Identifier layout (vertical)How rapidly the visual pattern of identifier characters changes from top to bottom. | 17.797 | −0.161 |
| Number layout frequencyHow rapidly the number of numeric values per line changes through the code. | 13 | +0.123 |
Intercept 0.07 + feature contributions = 1.252 (log-odds).
Score = sigmoid(1.252) = 0.778.
| Score | 0.43 |
|---|
| Score | 9 |
|---|
Run 1
The code is concise, with clear intent and logical structure. Each method performs a single action, and nesting is minimal. The class docstring effectively explains the purpose and extension mechanism. However, readability is slightly reduced because the GeoRSSFeed class and _get_dynamic_attr method are not shown, requiring some Django-specific context to fully understand the implementation.
Run 2
The code is well-structured with a clear class definition and subclassing pattern. It has minimal nesting, only one level of indentation, and each method contains a single action, making it highly readable. The docstring clearly explains the purpose and usage. Naming conventions follow Django standards, improving comprehension for experienced Django developers. The logic is straightforward, with no conditionals or branching. However, readability could improve by importing GeoRSSFeed explicitly, as it is referenced but not defined in the snippet, which may confuse readers unfamiliar with the codebase. The methods are concise and intent-revealing, but the use of _get_dynamic_attr is an internal helper that requires prior knowledge. Overall, the code is clean, minimal, and follows good practices for extensibility.
Run 3
The code is well-organized and highly readable. It clearly subclasses Django's Feed, has a descriptive docstring, and separates feed-level and item-level geometry handling into distinct, concise methods. Nesting is minimal, intent is explicit, and each method has a single responsibility. Minor deductions: the docstring could be slightly more concise, and 'geometry' appears in multiple places, but overall the structure and flow are clean.
Run 1
Code Structure: The class logically groups feed-level and item-level geometry handling. Nesting: Flat methods have no nested control flow. Clarity of intent: Descriptive method names and the docstring explain the purpose, though GeoRSSFeed is not defined or imported in the snippet, and the docstring has minor grammatical errors. Code length: The implementation is concise, although Atom1Feed and Rss201rev2Feed are unused here. Action granularity: Each method performs a single, focused return operation without packing unrelated actions together. Reading flow: Imports, class documentation, configuration, and methods follow a natural order; an additional blank line before the class would improve formatting.
Run 2
Code Structure: The class is logically organized, with its purpose documented and two closely related methods grouped together. Nesting: Flat methods have no nested control flow. Clarity of intent: Descriptive method names and the docstring clearly explain geometry support, although GeoRSSFeed is not defined or imported in the snippet. Code length: Concise, with no unnecessary implementation detail; the docstring has minor grammatical issues. Action granularity: Each method performs one clear return operation without combining unrelated actions. Reading flow: Imports, documentation, configuration, and methods follow a natural progression. Unused feed-generator imports and the missing GeoRSSFeed reference slightly distract from otherwise highly readable code.
Run 3
Code Structure: The class is logically organized, with configuration followed by two closely related methods. Nesting: Minimal nesting makes the code easy to scan. Clarity of intent: Descriptive method names and the docstring clearly explain the geometry extension, although GeoRSSFeed is not defined or imported in the snippet, and the docstring has minor grammatical issues. Code length: The implementation is concise without unnecessary logic. Action granularity: Each statement performs one clear action. Reading flow: The progression from imports to documentation, configuration, and methods is natural. Unused Atom1Feed and Rss201rev2Feed imports add slight distraction, and an additional blank line before the class would improve formatting.