Sample
pyint-bef4632bde49-I01
Remove comments and docstrings
Scores
| Method | Score | Scale |
|---|---|---|
| Posnett | 0 | 0–1; higher is more readable |
| Dorn | 0.065 | 0–1; higher is more readable |
| Mi | 0.741 | 0–1; higher is more readable |
| LLOC | 156 | Logical lines; fewer is more readable |
| DeepSeek V4 Pro | 12.33 | 0–20; mean of three runs |
| GPT-6.1 Sol | 14 | 0–20; mean of three runs |
| BTTF | 0.31 | 0–1; higher is more readable |
Views
Loading feature diagnosis…
Source regions
Feature contributions
Feature contributions
| Feature | Value | Contribution (log-odds) |
|---|---|---|
| Halstead volumeHow much symbolic information the code contains. It combines the total number of operators and values with the number of distinct ones. | 9857.17 | −325.287 |
| Source linesThe number of non-empty source lines. | 239 | +95.6 |
| Byte entropyHow varied the bytes in the source text are. Repeated bytes give a lower value; a more even mixture gives a higher value. | 4.411 | −6.617 |
Intercept 8.87 + feature contributions = -227.433 (log-odds).
Score = sigmoid(-227.433) = 0.
Feature contributions
| Feature | Value | Contribution (log-odds) |
|---|---|---|
| Indentation frequencyHow rapidly indentation changes from line to line. | 239 | +7.53 |
| Comment layout frequencyHow frequently the layout switches between lines containing only comments or whitespace and lines containing code. | 240 | −7.461 |
| Number layout frequencyHow rapidly the number of numeric values per line changes through the code. | 239 | −5.063 |
| Identifier layout (vertical)How rapidly the visual pattern of identifier characters changes from top to bottom. | 238.884 | +2.929 |
| Comment layout (horizontal)How rapidly the visual pattern of comment characters changes from left to right. | 0 | −0.804 |
| Operator visual areaThe share of the code’s visual area occupied by operators such as +, =, and *. | 0.089 | +0.075 |
| Identifier layout (horizontal)How rapidly the visual pattern of identifier characters changes from left to right. It measures spatial frequency, not the meaning of the names. | 84.963 | +0.067 |
Intercept 0.07 + feature contributions = -2.658 (log-odds).
Score = sigmoid(-2.658) = 0.065.
| Score | 0.741 |
|---|
| Score | 156 |
|---|
Run 1
The code exhibits reasonable structure with clear class and method separation, but suffers from several readability issues. The class has excessive blank lines and redundant comments, making it feel fragmented. There is moderate nesting in methods like `build_digest_header`, which uses multiple conditional branches for algorithm selection and qop handling. Action granularity is mixed—some lines attempt multiple operations (e.g., `seek(self._thread_local.pos)`), while others are unnecessarily verbose. Clarity of intent is inconsistent; methods like `handle_401` and `__call__` lack explanatory context for their complex logic. The use of walrus operators and type casting adds cognitive load. Reading flow is disrupted by the large number of inline comments that state the obvious rather than clarify non-obvious behavior. Overall, the code is functional but not optimized for quick comprehension.
Run 2
The code has clear type hints and a logical class structure, but readability suffers significantly from excessive blank lines and whitespace (e.g., multiple consecutive blank lines between every statement), which disrupts reading flow. Nested functions (md5_utf8, sha_utf8, KD) are defined conditionally inside a larger method, increasing cognitive load. The build_digest_header method is very long, packs multiple logical steps (algorithm selection, path construction, nonce handling, header assembly), and mixes string concatenation with f-strings. Some variable names are cryptic (KD, A1, HA1), and the heavy use of casts (cast(str, prep.method)) obscures intent. The handle_401 method is deeply nested and mixes authentication logic with response handling. While each line mostly performs one action, the overall structure feels cluttered due to inconsistent spacing and lack of separation between high-level steps.
Run 3
The code demonstrates generally good readability with clear class structure and organized methods. The nesting is mostly flat, and each function handles a distinct concern. Type hints and docstrings enhance clarity, though some complex logic in build_digest_header could be extracted for better comprehension. The use of inline comments explains non-obvious behavior like thread-local state initialization and body position tracking. Action granularity is appropriate, with most lines performing single operations. However, some methods like build_digest_header are quite long and contain multiple nested function definitions for different hash algorithms, adding complexity. The flow between methods is logical, though the abbreviation 'KD' for key derivation may not be immediately intuitive. Overall, the code is maintainable for developers familiar with HTTP authentication protocols, but could benefit from breaking down the longest methods and providing more context for cryptographic operations.
Run 1
Code Structure: Methods logically separate initialization, digest construction, response handling, and request preparation, but build_digest_header combines several responsibilities. Nesting: Mostly shallow, with moderate nesting in algorithm-specific helpers and retry handling; early returns simplify control flow. Clarity of intent: Method names and type hints help, but cryptographic abbreviations, terse variables such as s and _r, undocumented thread-local state, and the standalone r.content expression require background knowledge. Code length: Repeated hashing helpers, unused imports, an inactive entdig branch, and excessive blank lines add avoidable bulk. Action granularity: Generally one action per line, with readable multiline expressions; assignment expressions slightly increase cognitive load. Reading flow: The authentication sequence is coherent, but inconsistent whitespace, repetitive attribute access, and missing explanations for protocol details interrupt comprehension.
Run 2
Code Structure: Methods separate initialization, digest construction, response handling, and request setup logically, but digest construction combines several responsibilities. Nesting: Mostly shallow conditionals and early returns; nested hash helpers and retry logic add moderate complexity. Clarity of intent: Method names and type annotations help, but abbreviated variables such as KD, A1, s, and _r, undocumented protocol details, and implicit thread-local state obscure intent. Code length: Repeated hash wrappers, unused imports, excessive blank lines, and the inactive entdig branch add unnecessary bulk. Action granularity: Generally one operation per line, with only modest complexity from assignment expressions and compound conditions. Reading flow: Authentication proceeds in a sensible sequence, but sparse explanations, inconsistent whitespace, and state dependencies across methods interrupt comprehension.
Run 3
Code Structure: Responsibilities are separated into initialization, header construction, response handling, and request hooks, but build_digest_header combines several substantial tasks. Nesting: Mostly shallow conditionals and early returns keep complexity manageable; nested hash helpers and retry logic add some depth. Clarity of intent: Method names and type annotations help, but cryptographic abbreviations, terse variables, implicit thread-local state, and absent explanatory comments obscure protocol details. Code length: Repeated hash wrappers, unused imports, an unused digest placeholder, and excessive blank lines make the code longer than necessary. Action granularity: Statements generally perform one action per line, making operations easy to inspect, though the standalone r.content access has an unexplained side effect. Reading flow: Authentication steps follow a reasonably natural sequence, but inconsistent whitespace, repeated thread-local references, and underspecified dependencies interrupt the flow.