Sample

pyint-a9fc213a95e4-I12

Inline all eligible single-use intermediate local variables

Matched original source

Lines10

Scores

MethodScoreScale
Posnett0.650–1; higher is more readable
Dorn0.860–1; higher is more readable
Mi0.3070–1; higher is more readable
LLOC6Logical lines; fewer is more readable
DeepSeek V4 Pro17.670–20; mean of three runs
GPT-6.1 Sol17.330–20; mean of three runs
BTTF0.7890–1; higher is more readable

Views

Source code

from __future__ import annotations from typing import TYPE_CHECKING, Any from urllib3.exceptions import HTTPError as BaseHTTPError from .compat import JSONDecodeError as CompatJSONDecodeError class ConnectTimeout(ConnectionError, Timeout): """The request timed out while trying to connect to the remote server. Requests that produced this error are safe to retry. """

Loading feature diagnosis…

Source regions

Feature contributions

Feature contributions

FeatureValueContribution
(log-odds)
Byte entropyHow varied the bytes in the source text are. Repeated bytes give a lower value; a more even mixture gives a higher value.4.692−7.039
Halstead volumeHow much symbolic information the code contains. It combines the total number of operators and values with the number of distinct ones.157.891−5.21
Source linesThe number of non-empty source lines.10+4

Intercept 8.87 + feature contributions = 0.621 (log-odds).
Score = sigmoid(0.621) = 0.65.

Feature contributions

FeatureValueContribution
(log-odds)
Operator visual areaThe share of the code’s visual area occupied by operators such as +, =, and *.0.019+0.761
Comment layout frequencyHow frequently the layout switches between lines containing only comments or whitespace and lines containing code.11+0.647
Identifier layout (horizontal)How rapidly the visual pattern of identifier characters changes from left to right. It measures spatial frequency, not the meaning of the names.74+0.531
Indentation frequencyHow rapidly indentation changes from line to line.7−0.495
Number layout frequencyHow rapidly the number of numeric values per line changes through the code.1+0.398
Identifier layout (vertical)How rapidly the visual pattern of identifier characters changes from top to bottom.9.88−0.272
Comment layout (horizontal)How rapidly the visual pattern of comment characters changes from left to right.60.636+0.174

Intercept 0.07 + feature contributions = 1.813 (log-odds).
Score = sigmoid(1.813) = 0.86.

Score0.307
Score6
Run 1

The code is highly readable and well-structured. It uses clear imports with future annotations for modern type hinting. The exception class `ConnectTimeout` inherits logically from `ConnectionError` and `Timeout`, accurately reflecting its purpose. The docstring concisely explains when the error occurs and explicitly notes that retrying is safe, which is crucial for error handling. Nesting is nonexistent, and each import is on its own line, following clean action granularity. The code length is minimal and avoids unnecessary complexity. Reading flow is natural: imports first, then class definition with documentation. Minor deductions only because the docstring could include a period after the first sentence, and the class body contains only a docstring, which is acceptable for an exception class.

Run 2

The code is well-structured and highly readable. It uses clear imports with explicit typing support, minimal but purposeful exception class definition, and concise documentation. The inheritance from both ConnectionError and Timeout is logical. The docstring clearly states the error condition and retry safety. Nesting is non-existent, intent is unambiguous, and the code avoids unnecessary length. Minor deductions: the compat import alias is slightly verbose, and TYPE_CHECKING/Any are imported but not yet used in this snippet, which could hint at incomplete context.

Run 3

The code is highly readable due to its clear structure and purpose. It uses proper imports, including future annotations and type-checking imports, which are organized logically. The class definition is concise, with a single inheritance line and a clear docstring explaining the error's meaning and retry safety. Nesting is nonexistent, and the code length is minimal but sufficient. Action granularity is appropriate, with each import and class definition separated logically. The reading flow is natural, starting with imports, then the class definition, and ending with documentation. Minor deductions are for the unconventional import alias (BaseHTTPError) and the unused CompatJSONDecodeError import, which could confuse readers about intent. Overall, the code is nearly exemplary in readability.

Run 1

Code Structure: Imports precede a focused exception class, providing clear organization. Nesting: The code is flat, with no nested control flow. Clarity of intent: The class name and docstring clearly describe a connection timeout and its retry safety, though ConnectionError and Timeout are not defined or imported in the snippet. Code length: The implementation is concise, but several imports appear unused. Action granularity: Each import and declaration occupies its own line. Reading flow: The progression from imports to class declaration to documentation is natural; an additional blank line before the top-level class would improve formatting.

Run 2

Code Structure: Imports followed by a focused exception class provide logical organization, though import grouping and spacing could improve. Nesting: Minimal nesting makes the snippet easy to scan. Clarity of intent: The descriptive class name and docstring clearly explain the timeout and retry safety; however, Timeout is not defined or imported in the snippet, and ConnectionError's intended origin is unclear. Code length: The class is concise, but several imports appear unused in the provided code. Action granularity: Each import and declaration occupies its own line, avoiding compressed operations. Reading flow: The top-to-bottom flow is natural, with minor interruptions from unused imports and insufficient separation before the class.

Run 3

Code Structure: Imports followed by a focused exception class provide logical organization. Nesting: Only the class body is indented, making the code easy to scan. Clarity of intent: The descriptive class name and docstring clearly explain the connection timeout and retry safety; however, ConnectionError and Timeout are not defined or imported in the snippet, leaving their origins unclear. Code length: The implementation is concise, though several imports appear unused within the provided code. Action granularity: Each statement occupies its own line, with no compressed actions. Reading flow: The progression from imports to declaration to documentation is natural, but additional spacing between imports and the top-level class would improve visual separation.