Sample

pyint-2e262ecfa857-I05

Rewrite eligible decimal integer literals in hexadecimal notation

Matched original source

Lines298

Scores

MethodScoreScale
Posnett00–1; higher is more readable
Dorn0.640–1; higher is more readable
Mi0.5980–1; higher is more readable
LLOC145Logical lines; fewer is more readable
DeepSeek V4 Pro160–20; mean of three runs
GPT-6.1 Sol160–20; mean of three runs
BTTF0.5720–1; higher is more readable

Views

Source code

from __future__ import annotations import calendar import copy import time from collections.abc import Iterator, MutableMapping from http.cookiejar import Cookie, CookieJar, CookiePolicy from typing import TYPE_CHECKING, Any, TypeVar, overload from ._internal_utils import to_native_string from ._types import is_prepared as _is_prepared from .compat import Morsel, cookielib, urlparse, urlunparse import threading class RequestsCookieJar(CookieJar, MutableMapping[str, str | None]): # type: ignore[misc] """Compatibility class; is a http.cookiejar.CookieJar, but exposes a dict interface. This is the CookieJar we create by default for requests and sessions that don't specify one, since some clients may expect response.cookies and session.cookies to support dict operations. Requests does not use the dict interface internally; it's just for compatibility with external client code. All requests code should work out of the box with externally provided instances of ``CookieJar``, e.g. ``LWPCookieJar`` and ``FileCookieJar``. Unlike a regular CookieJar, this class is pickleable. .. warning:: dictionary operations that are normally O(1) may be O(n). """ _policy: CookiePolicy def get( # type: ignore[override] self, name: str, default: str | None = None, domain: str | None = None, path: str | None = None, ) -> str | None: """Dict-like get() that also supports optional domain and path args in order to resolve naming collisions from using one cookie jar over multiple domains. .. warning:: operation is O(n), not O(1). """ try: return self._find_no_duplicates(name, domain, path) except KeyError: return default def set( self, name: str, value: str | Morsel[dict[str, str]] | None, **kwargs: Any ) -> Cookie | None: """Dict-like set() that also supports optional domain and path args in order to resolve naming collisions from using one cookie jar over multiple domains. """ # support client code that unsets cookies by assignment of a None value: if value is None: remove_cookie_by_name( self, name, domain=kwargs.get("domain"), path=kwargs.get("path") ) return if isinstance(value, Morsel): c = morsel_to_cookie(value) else: c = create_cookie(name, value, **kwargs) self.set_cookie(c) return c def iterkeys(self) -> Iterator[str]: """Dict-like iterkeys() that returns an iterator of names of cookies from the jar. .. seealso:: itervalues() and iteritems(). """ for cookie in iter(self): yield cookie.name def keys(self) -> list[str]: # type: ignore[override] """Dict-like keys() that returns a list of names of cookies from the jar. .. seealso:: values() and items(). """ return list(self.iterkeys()) def itervalues(self) -> Iterator[str | None]: """Dict-like itervalues() that returns an iterator of values of cookies from the jar. .. seealso:: iterkeys() and iteritems(). """ for cookie in iter(self): yield cookie.value def values(self) -> list[str | None]: # type: ignore[override] """Dict-like values() that returns a list of values of cookies from the jar. .. seealso:: keys() and items(). """ return list(self.itervalues()) def iteritems(self) -> Iterator[tuple[str, str | None]]: """Dict-like iteritems() that returns an iterator of name-value tuples from the jar. .. seealso:: iterkeys() and itervalues(). """ for cookie in iter(self): yield cookie.name, cookie.value def items(self) -> list[tuple[str, str | None]]: # type: ignore[override] """Dict-like items() that returns a list of name-value tuples from the jar. Allows client-code to call ``dict(RequestsCookieJar)`` and get a vanilla python dict of key value pairs. .. seealso:: keys() and values(). """ return list(self.iteritems()) def list_domains(self) -> list[str]: """Utility method to list all the domains in the jar.""" domains: list[str] = [] for cookie in iter(self): if cookie.domain not in domains: domains.append(cookie.domain) return domains def list_paths(self) -> list[str]: """Utility method to list all the paths in the jar.""" paths: list[str] = [] for cookie in iter(self): if cookie.path not in paths: paths.append(cookie.path) return paths def multiple_domains(self) -> bool: """Returns True if there are multiple domains in the jar. Returns False otherwise. :rtype: bool """ domains: list[str] = [] for cookie in iter(self): if cookie.domain is not None and cookie.domain in domains: # type: ignore[reportUnnecessaryComparison] # defensive check return True domains.append(cookie.domain) return False # there is only one domain in jar def get_dict( self, domain: str | None = None, path: str | None = None ) -> dict[str, str | None]: """Takes as an argument an optional domain and path and returns a plain old Python dict of name-value pairs of cookies that meet the requirements. :rtype: dict """ dictionary: dict[str, str | None] = {} for cookie in iter(self): if (domain is None or cookie.domain == domain) and ( path is None or cookie.path == path ): dictionary[cookie.name] = cookie.value return dictionary def __iter__(self) -> Iterator[Cookie]: # type: ignore[override] """RequestCookieJar's __iter__ comes from CookieJar not MutableMapping.""" return super().__iter__() def __contains__(self, name: object) -> bool: try: return super().__contains__(name) except CookieConflictError: return True def __getitem__(self, name: str) -> str | None: """Dict-like __getitem__() for compatibility with client code. Throws exception if there are more than one cookie with name. In that case, use the more explicit get() method instead. .. warning:: operation is O(n), not O(1). """ return self._find_no_duplicates(name) def __setitem__( self, name: str, value: str | Morsel[dict[str, str]] | None ) -> None: """Dict-like __setitem__ for compatibility with client code. Throws exception if there is already a cookie of that name in the jar. In that case, use the more explicit set() method instead. """ self.set(name, value) def __delitem__(self, name: str) -> None: """Deletes a cookie given a name. Wraps ``http.cookiejar.CookieJar``'s ``remove_cookie_by_name()``. """ remove_cookie_by_name(self, name) def set_cookie(self, cookie: Cookie, *args: Any, **kwargs: Any) -> None: if ( (value := cookie.value) is not None and value.startswith('"') and value.endswith('"') ): cookie.value = value.replace('\\"', "") return super().set_cookie(cookie, *args, **kwargs) def update( # type: ignore[override] self, other: CookieJar | SupportsKeysAndGetItem[str, str] ) -> None: """Updates this jar with cookies from another CookieJar or dict-like""" if isinstance(other, cookielib.CookieJar): for cookie in other: self.set_cookie(copy.copy(cookie)) else: super().update(other) def _find( self, name: str, domain: str | None = None, path: str | None = None ) -> str | None: """Requests uses this method internally to get cookie values. If there are conflicting cookies, _find arbitrarily chooses one. See _find_no_duplicates if you want an exception thrown if there are conflicting cookies. :param name: a string containing name of cookie :param domain: (optional) string containing domain of cookie :param path: (optional) string containing path of cookie :return: cookie.value """ for cookie in iter(self): if cookie.name == name: if domain is None or cookie.domain == domain: if path is None or cookie.path == path: return cookie.value raise KeyError(f"name={name!r}, domain={domain!r}, path={path!r}") def _find_no_duplicates( self, name: str, domain: str | None = None, path: str | None = None ) -> str: """Both ``__get_item__`` and ``get`` call this function: it's never used elsewhere in Requests. :param name: a string containing name of cookie :param domain: (optional) string containing domain of cookie :param path: (optional) string containing path of cookie :raises KeyError: if cookie is not found :raises CookieConflictError: if there are multiple cookies that match name and optionally domain and path :return: cookie.value """ toReturn = None for cookie in iter(self): if cookie.name == name: if domain is None or cookie.domain == domain: if path is None or cookie.path == path: if toReturn is not None: # if there are multiple cookies that meet passed in criteria raise CookieConflictError( f"There are multiple cookies with name, {name!r}" ) # we will eventually return this as long as no cookie conflict toReturn = cookie.value if toReturn is not None: return toReturn raise KeyError(f"name={name!r}, domain={domain!r}, path={path!r}") def __getstate__(self) -> dict[str, Any]: """Unlike a normal CookieJar, this class is pickleable.""" state = self.__dict__.copy() # remove the unpickleable RLock object state.pop("_cookies_lock") return state def __setstate__(self, state: dict[str, Any]) -> None: """Unlike a normal CookieJar, this class is pickleable.""" self.__dict__.update(state) if "_cookies_lock" not in self.__dict__: self._cookies_lock = threading.RLock() def copy(self) -> RequestsCookieJar: """Return a copy of this RequestsCookieJar.""" new_cj = RequestsCookieJar() new_cj.set_policy(self.get_policy()) new_cj.update(self) return new_cj def get_policy(self) -> CookiePolicy: """Return the CookiePolicy instance used.""" return self._policy

Loading feature diagnosis…

Source regions

Feature contributions

Feature contributions

FeatureValueContribution
(log-odds)
Halstead volumeHow much symbolic information the code contains. It combines the total number of operators and values with the number of distinct ones.8743.824−288.546
Source linesThe number of non-empty source lines.298+119.2
Byte entropyHow varied the bytes in the source text are. Repeated bytes give a lower value; a more even mixture gives a higher value.4.384−6.576

Intercept 8.87 + feature contributions = -167.052 (log-odds).
Score = sigmoid(-167.052) = 0.

Feature contributions

FeatureValueContribution
(log-odds)
Comment layout frequencyHow frequently the layout switches between lines containing only comments or whitespace and lines containing code.299−9.55
Indentation frequencyHow rapidly indentation changes from line to line.198+6.111
Identifier layout (vertical)How rapidly the visual pattern of identifier characters changes from top to bottom.297.822+3.753
Identifier layout (horizontal)How rapidly the visual pattern of identifier characters changes from left to right. It measures spatial frequency, not the meaning of the names.133.973−2.009
Comment layout (horizontal)How rapidly the visual pattern of comment characters changes from left to right.133.99+1.357
Operator visual areaThe share of the code’s visual area occupied by operators such as +, =, and *.0.051+0.443
Number layout frequencyHow rapidly the number of numeric values per line changes through the code.1+0.398

Intercept 0.07 + feature contributions = 0.573 (log-odds).
Score = sigmoid(0.573) = 0.64.

Score0.598
Score145
Run 1

The code is highly readable with clear structure, comprehensive docstrings, and logical organization. It uses flat nesting (maximum 2-3 levels), maintains one action per line, and follows natural reading flow. Type hints are used consistently, and methods are appropriately named (get, set, keys, values, items). The main strength is the excellent documentation explaining the 'why' behind methods. Minor deductions: some methods like multiple_domains could be simplified using set operations, and a few comments contain defensive redundancies. Overall, this represents production-quality code with very high clarity of intent.

Run 2

The code is highly readable with clear structure and logical organization. Each method serves a single, focused purpose with descriptive names and comprehensive docstrings. Nesting is generally flat, although _find and _find_no_duplicates have three-level nested conditionals that could be flattened. The code maintains one action per line throughout, and the reading flow follows a natural progression from basic operations to more complex methods. Docstrings are excellent, clearly explaining the O(n) complexity warnings, compatibility purposes, and method behaviors. Type hints are used consistently and appropriately. The code length is justified given the comprehensive documentation. Minor deductions: nested conditionals in finding methods and a few slightly verbose docstrings. Overall, this demonstrates exemplary readability that prioritizes maintainability and clear intent communication.

Run 3

The code has a clear class structure with logical method definitions, which supports readability. However, several issues reduce clarity: it uses a mix of naming styles (e.g., 'toReturn' instead of 'to_return'), has multiple methods with repetitive docstrings, and includes deeply nested conditional blocks in methods like '_find' and '_find_no_duplicates'. The 'set_cookie' method uses the walrus operator in an awkward way, making the intent less clear. Some methods (e.g., '__iter__') are trivial and could be consolidated, but not severely. The class purpose is documented well, and methods generally have a single action per line, but the overall flow is interrupted by long docblocks and inconsistent type hints. The code is fairly maintainable but not highly readable due to nesting and minor style inconsistencies.

Run 1

1. Code Structure: Well-organized class with focused methods covering mapping compatibility, lookup, serialization, and copying; imports are less consistently organized. 2. Nesting: Most methods are shallow, but _find and _find_no_duplicates use unnecessarily deep conditional chains. 3. Clarity of intent: Descriptive method names, type annotations, and extensive docstrings clarify purpose. However, multiple_domains checks for repeated domains rather than distinct domains, contradicting its documentation; toReturn is also a weak, inconsistently styled name. 4. Code length: Individual methods are generally concise, although repetitive iterator wrappers and verbose documentation lengthen the class. 5. Action granularity: Statements generally perform one action each; the assignment expression in set_cookie slightly increases cognitive load. 6. Reading flow: Consistent formatting and related method grouping support natural reading, while long type-ignore comments, repeated filtering logic, and references to helpers outside the snippet introduce friction.

Run 2

Code Structure: Methods are logically grouped around dictionary compatibility, cookie lookup, and serialization, with clear separation of responsibilities. Nesting: Most methods are flat, but _find and _find_no_duplicates contain unnecessarily deep conditional nesting. Clarity of intent: Descriptive method names, type annotations, and extensive docstrings explain most behavior well; however, multiple_domains checks repeated domains rather than distinct domains, contradicting its stated purpose. Some comments and docstrings also inaccurately describe behavior. Code length: Individual methods are generally concise, though repetitive documentation and duplicated filtering logic add bulk. Action granularity: Statements usually perform one action per line; the assignment expression in set_cookie slightly increases cognitive load. Reading flow: Consistent formatting and predictable method patterns support natural reading, but inconsistent naming such as toReturn, long inline type-ignore comments, and poorly ordered or apparently unused imports introduce distractions.

Run 3

Code Structure: Methods are logically grouped around dictionary compatibility, cookie lookup, and serialization, with clear separation of responsibilities. Nesting: Most methods are shallow, but _find and _find_no_duplicates contain several nested conditions that could be flattened. Clarity of intent: Descriptive method names, type annotations, and docstrings explain most behavior well; however, multiple_domains checks for repeated domains rather than distinct domains, and some docstrings do not match implementation behavior. Code length: Individual methods are generally concise, though repetitive documentation and duplicated lookup logic make the class longer than necessary. Action granularity: Statements generally perform one action each; the assignment expression in set_cookie slightly increases cognitive load. Reading flow: Consistent formatting and predictable method patterns aid scanning, but inconsistent naming such as toReturn, long inline suppression comments, and the misplaced threading import interrupt the flow.