Sample

pyint-6467c1c2b2e7-I04

Replace names with deterministic minifier-style shortest identifiers

Matched original source

Scores

MethodScoreScale
Posnett0.4050–1; higher is more readable
Dorn0.9180–1; higher is more readable
Mi0.4960–1; higher is more readable
LLOC6Logical lines; fewer is more readable
DeepSeek V4 Pro17.670–20; mean of three runs
GPT-6.1 Sol170–20; mean of three runs
BTTF0.8370–1; higher is more readable

Views

Source code

from __future__ import annotations from typing import TYPE_CHECKING, Any from urllib3.exceptions import HTTPError as BaseHTTPError from .compat import JSONDecodeError as CompatJSONDecodeError class HTTPError(RequestException): """An HTTP error occurred."""

Loading feature diagnosis…

Source regions

Feature contributions

Feature contributions

FeatureValueContribution
(log-odds)
Byte entropyHow varied the bytes in the source text are. Repeated bytes give a lower value; a more even mixture gives a higher value.4.853−7.279
Halstead volumeHow much symbolic information the code contains. It combines the total number of operators and values with the number of distinct ones.144.754−4.777
Source linesThe number of non-empty source lines.7+2.8

Intercept 8.87 + feature contributions = -0.386 (log-odds).
Score = sigmoid(-0.386) = 0.405.

Feature contributions

FeatureValueContribution
(log-odds)
Identifier layout (horizontal)How rapidly the visual pattern of identifier characters changes from left to right. It measures spatial frequency, not the meaning of the names.59.875+1.129
Comment layout frequencyHow frequently the layout switches between lines containing only comments or whitespace and lines containing code.8+0.753
Operator visual areaThe share of the code’s visual area occupied by operators such as +, =, and *.0.024+0.713
Indentation frequencyHow rapidly indentation changes from line to line.7−0.495
Number layout frequencyHow rapidly the number of numeric values per line changes through the code.1+0.398
Identifier layout (vertical)How rapidly the visual pattern of identifier characters changes from top to bottom.6.705−0.316
Comment layout (horizontal)How rapidly the visual pattern of comment characters changes from left to right.60+0.164

Intercept 0.07 + feature contributions = 2.416 (log-odds).
Score = sigmoid(2.416) = 0.918.

Score0.496
Score6
Run 1

The code is well-structured and highly readable. It uses a clear import block with forward compatibility and type-checking support. Class definition is concise with a docstring that clearly states intent. Nesting is virtually nonexistent, and each import/logical action is on its own line. One minor deduction for lack of context: the class is empty but inherits from `RequestException`, and `CompatJSONDecodeError` import is not used in the shown snippet, making purpose slightly ambiguous without surrounding code. Overall, very clean.

Run 2

The code is highly readable. It has a clear, logical structure: importing necessary modules, defining a class with a docstring. Nesting is flat, with no nested blocks. The intent is clear—defining an HTTP error exception. The code is concise; it avoids unnecessary length by using `__future__` and `TYPE_CHECKING` for forward compatibility. Action granularity is appropriate; each import is on its own line, and the class definition is simple. Reading flow is natural, moving from imports to class definition. Minor deductions for the somewhat redundant `JSONDecodeError` alias and the unused `BaseHTTPError` import, which could confuse readers about their purpose.

Run 3

The code is highly readable due to its clear structure and purposeful imports. It logically organizes imports into standard library, third-party, and local modules. Nesting is minimal and flat. The class definition is concise and clearly named, extending a known base exception, with a descriptive docstring. Each line performs a single action, and the reading flow is natural. Minor deduction due to the slight ambiguity of aliasing imports and the incomplete context of 'RequestException', but overall it is clean and straightforward.

Run 1

Code Structure: Imports and the exception class are logically organized, though RequestException is not defined or imported in the snippet. Nesting: The code is flat, with only a simple class body. Clarity of intent: The class name and docstring clearly identify an HTTP exception, but unused imports and the similarly named BaseHTTPError obscure the relationship between exception types. Code length: Very concise, although several imports appear unnecessary for the shown code. Action granularity: Each import and declaration occupies its own line. Reading flow: Natural top-to-bottom progression, with minor distractions from unused dependencies and insufficient spacing before the top-level class.

Run 2

Code Structure: Imports precede a clearly separated exception class, providing logical organization. Nesting: The code is flat apart from the class body. Clarity of intent: The class name and docstring clearly indicate an HTTP exception, though RequestException is not defined or imported in the snippet, and several imports are unused. Code length: The class is concise, but unused imports add clutter. Action granularity: Each statement occupies its own line. Reading flow: The import-to-class progression is natural, although an additional blank line before the top-level class would improve conventional formatting.

Run 3

Code Structure: Imports followed by an exception class provide a simple, logical organization, though several imports are unused in this snippet. Nesting: Only the class body is indented, making the code easy to scan. Clarity of intent: The class name and docstring clearly identify an HTTP exception, but RequestException is not defined or imported in the shown code, leaving its origin unclear. Code length: Very concise, with some unnecessary import overhead. Action granularity: Each import and declaration occupies its own line. Reading flow: Natural top-to-bottom flow, although additional spacing between import groups and before the class would improve visual separation.