Sample
pyint-c4d4b255d9b8-I12
Inline all eligible single-use intermediate local variables
Scores
| Method | Score | Scale |
|---|---|---|
| Posnett | 0.002 | 0–1; higher is more readable |
| Dorn | 0.697 | 0–1; higher is more readable |
| Mi | 0.535 | 0–1; higher is more readable |
| LLOC | 29 | Logical lines; fewer is more readable |
| DeepSeek V4 Pro | 17 | 0–20; mean of three runs |
| GPT-6.1 Sol | 18 | 0–20; mean of three runs |
| BTTF | 0.719 | 0–1; higher is more readable |
Views
Loading feature diagnosis…
Source regions
Feature contributions
Feature contributions
| Feature | Value | Contribution (log-odds) |
|---|---|---|
| Halstead volumeHow much symbolic information the code contains. It combines the total number of operators and values with the number of distinct ones. | 1056.775 | −34.874 |
| Source linesThe number of non-empty source lines. | 66 | +26.4 |
| Byte entropyHow varied the bytes in the source text are. Repeated bytes give a lower value; a more even mixture gives a higher value. | 4.513 | −6.769 |
Intercept 8.87 + feature contributions = -6.372 (log-odds).
Score = sigmoid(-6.372) = 0.002.
Feature contributions
| Feature | Value | Contribution (log-odds) |
|---|---|---|
| Comment layout frequencyHow frequently the layout switches between lines containing only comments or whitespace and lines containing code. | 67 | −1.336 |
| Indentation frequencyHow rapidly indentation changes from line to line. | 46 | +0.854 |
| Number layout frequencyHow rapidly the number of numeric values per line changes through the code. | 46 | −0.635 |
| Operator visual areaThe share of the code’s visual area occupied by operators such as +, =, and *. | 0.039 | +0.566 |
| Identifier layout (vertical)How rapidly the visual pattern of identifier characters changes from top to bottom. | 65.833 | +0.51 |
| Identifier layout (horizontal)How rapidly the visual pattern of identifier characters changes from left to right. It measures spatial frequency, not the meaning of the names. | 77 | +0.404 |
| Comment layout (horizontal)How rapidly the visual pattern of comment characters changes from left to right. | 74.612 | +0.399 |
Intercept 0.07 + feature contributions = 0.833 (log-odds).
Score = sigmoid(0.833) = 0.697.
| Score | 0.535 |
|---|
| Score | 29 |
|---|
Run 1
The code demonstrates excellent readability through clear structure and organization. Imports are logically grouped with a mix of standard library, third-party, and local modules. The Factory class has a well-documented purpose with a clear docstring explaining its usage and parameters. Each method has a single, focused responsibility - __init__, __getstate__, and __setstate__ each perform one clear action. The code uses modern Python features appropriately (__slots__, zip with strict=True, type hints) without sacrificing clarity. Naming conventions are consistent and descriptive. The use of __slots__ reduces memory overhead while the concise implementation avoids unnecessary verbosity. Comments are minimal but meaningful, with version annotations where relevant. The only minor deduction is that some context about the broader attrs library would help understand this class's role in the larger system, but within its scope, it's exceptionally clear and well-structured.
Run 2
The code is well-structured and readable. It uses clear class and method definitions, type hints, and descriptive docstrings. The Factory class is flat with no unnecessary nesting, and each method performs a single logical action. Naming is consistent and intent is clear, especially with docstrings explaining *takes_self* and pickle compatibility. Imports are organized, though some unused imports (e.g., contextlib, itertools, sys) slightly reduce clarity. The __getstate__ and __setstate__ methods are concise but use zip with strict=True, which is fine for supported Python versions. Overall, the code is highly readable with minor room for improvement in import tidiness.
Run 3
The code is generally well-structured and readable. It has clear imports, a focused class with a single responsibility, and good documentation. The Factory class is flat with no nested logic, and methods are concise with one action per line. The reading flow is natural, with the class docstring clearly explaining purpose and parameters. Minor deductions: several unused imports reduce clarity, and the pickle support methods, while simple, add slight noise to an otherwise clean class. The explicit use of __slots__ is good practice but may not be immediately obvious to all readers. Overall, the code is maintainable and easy to follow.
Run 1
Code Structure: Imports and a focused class are logically organized, although many imports are unused in this excerpt. Nesting: Methods are flat, with only one shallow loop. Clarity of intent: Descriptive names and a detailed class docstring clearly explain the factory behavior; pickle methods are understandable, though their docstrings are informal. Code length: The implementation is concise, but the extensive import block and documentation outweigh the small amount of executable code. Action granularity: Each statement performs one clear action; the generator expression is compact without being difficult to follow. Reading flow: The progression from initialization to serialization and restoration is natural, with consistent formatting and minimal distractions.
Run 2
Code Structure: The class is logically organized, with configuration, initialization, and serialization methods clearly separated. Nesting: Minimal nesting makes control flow easy to follow. Clarity of intent: Descriptive names and a detailed class docstring explain the factory's purpose; the serialization docstrings are less precise. Code length: The implementation is concise, although the many imports unused in this excerpt add visual clutter. Action granularity: Each statement performs one clear action, and the generator expression remains readable. Reading flow: Methods follow a natural order, but limited spacing between import groups and before the class slightly weakens presentation.
Run 3
Code Structure: Imports and a single focused class are logically organized, though many imports are unused in this snippet. Nesting: Methods are flat, with only one simple loop. Clarity of intent: Descriptive names and a detailed class docstring clearly explain factory behavior; serialization methods are straightforward, although their docstrings could describe state handling more precisely. Code length: The implementation is concise, with documentation accounting for most of its length. Action granularity: Each statement performs one clear action; the generator expression remains easy to follow. Reading flow: The class progresses naturally from documentation and slots to initialization and serialization. Minor spacing improvements between import groups and before the class would improve visual organization.