Sample

int-8b47a270c08b-I02

Shorten method, parameter, and local names without collisions

Matched original source

Lines36

Scores

MethodScoreScale
Posnett0.9830–1; higher is more readable
Scalabrino0.9210–1; higher is more readable
Dorn0.8070–1; higher is more readable
Mi0.7890–1; higher is more readable
LLOC5Logical lines; fewer is more readable
DeepSeek V4 Pro180–20; mean of three runs
GPT-6.1 Sol180–20; mean of three runs
BTTF0.4160–1; higher is more readable

Views

Source code

package io.netty.handler.codec; /** * An {@link CodecException} which is thrown by an encoder. */ public class EncoderException extends CodecException { private static final long serialVersionUID = -5086121160476476774L; /** * Creates a new instance. */ public EncoderException() { } /** * Creates a new instance. */ public EncoderException(String mes, Throwable cau) { super(mes, cau); } /** * Creates a new instance. */ public EncoderException(String mes2) { super(mes2); } /** * Creates a new instance. */ public EncoderException(Throwable cau2) { super(cau2); } }

Loading feature diagnosis…

Source regions

Feature contributions

Feature contributions

FeatureValueContribution
(log-odds)
Source linesThe number of non-empty source lines.36+14.4
Halstead volumeHow much symbolic information the code contains. It combines the total number of operators and values with the number of distinct ones.375−12.375
Byte entropyHow varied the bytes in the source text are. Repeated bytes give a lower value; a more even mixture gives a higher value.4.548−6.822

Intercept 8.87 + feature contributions = 4.073 (log-odds).
Score = sigmoid(4.073) = 0.983.

Score0.921

Feature contributions

FeatureValueContribution
(log-odds)
Identifier layout (horizontal)How rapidly the visual pattern of identifier characters changes from left to right. It measures spatial frequency, not the meaning of the names.70.946+0.66
Operator visual areaThe share of the code’s visual area occupied by operators such as +, =, and *.0.054+0.417
Comment layout (horizontal)How rapidly the visual pattern of comment characters changes from left to right.70.946+0.34
Number layout frequencyHow rapidly the number of numeric values per line changes through the code.26−0.176
Indentation frequencyHow rapidly indentation changes from line to line.26+0.162
Comment layout frequencyHow frequently the layout switches between lines containing only comments or whitespace and lines containing code.33−0.132
Identifier layout (vertical)How rapidly the visual pattern of identifier characters changes from top to bottom.35.556+0.087

Intercept 0.07 + feature contributions = 1.429 (log-odds).
Score = sigmoid(1.429) = 0.807.

Score0.789
Score5
Run 1

The code is highly readable due to its clear and straightforward structure. It follows standard Java exception class conventions with multiple overloaded constructors, each performing exactly one action. The nesting is minimal (only the class itself), and the reading flow is natural: class declaration, serialVersionUID, then constructors in a logical order. Javadoc comments, while repetitive, clearly state the purpose of each constructor. Parameter names are slightly abbreviated ('mes', 'cau', 'mes2', 'cau2'), which slightly reduces clarity, but this is a minor issue. The class inherits from CodecException, and the intent of each constructor is immediately obvious. Overall, the code is concise, well-organized, and easy to understand.

Run 2

The code is a clean, minimal exception class with excellent readability. Structure is logical and follows standard Java conventions. Nesting is nonexistent—all constructors are flat and independent. Intent is immediately clear from the class name, Javadoc, and inheritance from CodecException. Length is concise with no redundant code. Each constructor is a single clear action delegating to the parent. Reading flow is natural: class declaration, serial version UID, then constructors in a logical order. Minor deductions: parameter names are abbreviated ('mes', 'cau') rather than fully descriptive, and the repetitive Javadoc comments add little value. Overall, this is exceptionally readable code.

Run 3

Highly readable code. The structure is logical and clean, with a single class extending CodecException and four constructors following a consistent pattern. Nesting is nonexistent, contributing to flat simplicity. Intent is clear from the class name, Javadoc, and constructor chain. The code is concise with no redundancy—each constructor delegates to an appropriate superclass constructor. Action granularity is one action per line, making each line unambiguous. The reading flow is natural: imports, class declaration, serialVersionUID, then constructors in logical order. Minor deductions could be made for the vague repeated Javadoc ('Creates a new instance.') and abbreviated parameter names (mes, cau, mes2, cau2), which slightly reduce clarity. Overall, it is an excellent example of simple, maintainable exception class design.

Run 1

Code Structure: The exception class is logically organized, with its serialization field followed by constructor overloads. Nesting: Minimal nesting makes the code easy to scan. Clarity of intent: The class name, inheritance, and class documentation clearly convey its purpose, but abbreviated and inconsistently numbered parameter names (mes, cau, mes2, cau2) reduce clarity. Code length: The implementation is concise, although repeated generic constructor comments add little value. Action granularity: Each constructor performs a single delegation on its own line. Reading flow: Consistent formatting and a conventional layout support natural reading.

Run 2

Code Structure: A well-organized exception class with a constant followed by constructor overloads. Nesting: Minimal, limited to class and constructor bodies. Clarity of intent: The class name, inheritance, and class-level documentation clearly convey its purpose, but abbreviated and inconsistently numbered parameter names (mes, cau, mes2, cau2) reduce clarity. Code length: Appropriately concise, though repeated generic constructor comments add little value. Action granularity: Each nonempty constructor contains a single superclass call on its own line. Reading flow: Consistent formatting and a natural constructor sequence make the code easy to scan.

Run 3

Code Structure: The exception class is logically organized, with its serialization field followed by constructors. Nesting: Minimal nesting makes it easy to scan. Clarity of intent: The class name, inheritance, and class documentation clearly communicate its purpose, but abbreviated parameter names such as mes, cau, mes2, and cau2 are less descriptive than message and cause. Code length: The implementation is concise; repeated generic constructor comments add little value. Action granularity: Each constructor performs a single delegation on its own line. Reading flow: Consistent formatting and straightforward constructor overloads create a natural reading flow.