Sample
int-1703c3076a91-I13
Lower every eligible classic and enhanced for loop to a while loop
Scores
| Method | Score | Scale |
|---|---|---|
| Posnett | 0.884 | 0–1; higher is more readable |
| Scalabrino | 0.967 | 0–1; higher is more readable |
| Dorn | 0.849 | 0–1; higher is more readable |
| Mi | 0.77 | 0–1; higher is more readable |
| LLOC | 3 | Logical lines; fewer is more readable |
| DeepSeek V4 Pro | 19.33 | 0–20; mean of three runs |
| GPT-6.1 Sol | 19 | 0–20; mean of three runs |
| BTTF | 0.691 | 0–1; higher is more readable |
Views
Loading feature diagnosis…
Source regions
Feature contributions
Feature contributions
| Feature | Value | Contribution (log-odds) |
|---|---|---|
| Byte entropyHow varied the bytes in the source text are. Repeated bytes give a lower value; a more even mixture gives a higher value. | 4.704 | −7.055 |
| Source linesThe number of non-empty source lines. | 16 | +6.4 |
| Halstead volumeHow much symbolic information the code contains. It combines the total number of operators and values with the number of distinct ones. | 187.296 | −6.181 |
Intercept 8.87 + feature contributions = 2.034 (log-odds).
Score = sigmoid(2.034) = 0.884.
| Score | 0.967 |
|---|
Feature contributions
| Feature | Value | Contribution (log-odds) |
|---|---|---|
| Identifier layout (horizontal)How rapidly the visual pattern of identifier characters changes from left to right. It measures spatial frequency, not the meaning of the names. | 65.941 | +0.872 |
| Comment layout frequencyHow frequently the layout switches between lines containing only comments or whitespace and lines containing code. | 17 | +0.434 |
| Number layout frequencyHow rapidly the number of numeric values per line changes through the code. | 1 | +0.398 |
| Indentation frequencyHow rapidly indentation changes from line to line. | 12 | −0.322 |
| Comment layout (horizontal)How rapidly the visual pattern of comment characters changes from left to right. | 66 | +0.26 |
| Operator visual areaThe share of the code’s visual area occupied by operators such as +, =, and *. | 0.076 | +0.203 |
| Identifier layout (vertical)How rapidly the visual pattern of identifier characters changes from top to bottom. | 15.806 | −0.189 |
Intercept 0.07 + feature contributions = 1.727 (log-odds).
Score = sigmoid(1.727) = 0.849.
| Score | 0.77 |
|---|
| Score | 3 |
|---|
Run 1
The code is exceptionally readable. It is a small, highly focused interface with a clear purpose: defining operations for concurrent long addition. The package and import are minimal and correct, and the Javadoc succinctly explains the abstraction. The methods are named using standard conventions (`increment`, `add`, `sum`) and have unambiguous signatures. No nesting exists, and action granularity is ideal—one declaration per line. The structure follows standard Java interface organization, and the reading flow is natural: documentation, then method declarations in a logical order. Concise without being terse.
Run 2
The code is a concise Java interface with clear structure and purpose. The package declaration and single import are appropriate and aid organization. There is no nesting or unnecessary complexity. The interface name 'LongAddable' and method names ('increment', 'add', 'sum') clearly convey intent. Javadoc provides useful context without being verbose. Each method declaration occupies a single line, enhancing readability. The overall flow is natural and logical for an interface definition.
Run 3
The code is highly readable. The structure is logical and minimal, consisting of a clear package declaration, a single import, and a well-defined interface. Nesting is nonexistent, as the interface is flat with only three method signatures. Clarity of intent is excellent; the Javadoc succinctly explains the purpose, and method names like 'increment', 'add', and 'sum' are self-explanatory. The code is concise, avoiding unnecessary boilerplate, and each method declaration is on its own line, maintaining one action per line. The reading flow is natural: package, annotation, documentation, interface name, and then methods in a logical order. Minor deductions for lack of method-level Javadoc, though not required in this context.
Run 1
Code Structure: A simple interface logically groups three related operations. Nesting: No unnecessary nesting; only the interface body. Clarity of intent: The documentation and method names clearly describe concurrent long accumulation, though the parameter name 'x' is generic. Code length: Concise, with no redundant declarations. Action granularity: Each method declaration occupies its own line. Reading flow: Natural progression from package and import to documentation, annotation, and interface methods; a blank line after the package declaration would slightly improve visual separation.
Run 2
Code Structure: A minimal, logically organized interface with package, import, documentation, annotation, and method declarations. Nesting: Only the interface body, making it easy to scan. Clarity of intent: The documentation and method names clearly describe concurrent long accumulation; however, the parameter name 'x' is less descriptive, and concurrency semantics are not detailed. Code length: Concise, with no unnecessary implementation or boilerplate. Action granularity: Each method declaration occupies its own line. Reading flow: Natural top-to-bottom progression, with blank lines separating operations; an extra blank line after the package declaration would slightly improve formatting.
Run 3
Code Structure: The package, import, documentation, annotation, and interface are logically organized. Nesting: No nested logic; only a simple interface body. Clarity of intent: LongAddable and its increment, add, and sum methods clearly communicate the purpose, supported by a brief class-level comment. However, the parameter name x is generic, and concurrency guarantees are not documented precisely. Code length: Minimal, with no unnecessary implementation or boilerplate. Action granularity: Each method declaration occupies its own line. Reading flow: Conventional Java ordering and blank lines between methods make the interface easy to scan; a blank line between the package and import would slightly improve formatting.