Sample

int-dc8cd675ef36-I09

Select one of ten low-readability unrelated code templates per class

Matched original source

Lines45

Scores

MethodScoreScale
Posnett0.9930–1; higher is more readable
Dorn0.6870–1; higher is more readable
Mi0.4710–1; higher is more readable
LLOC1Logical lines; fewer is more readable
DeepSeek V4 Pro18.330–20; mean of three runs
GPT-6.1 Sol190–20; mean of three runs
BTTF0.6860–1; higher is more readable

Views

Source code

package org.springframework.test.annotation; import java.lang.annotation.Documented; import java.lang.annotation.ElementType; import java.lang.annotation.Retention; import java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy; import java.lang.annotation.Target; /** * Test annotation for use with JUnit 4 to indicate that a test method has to finish * execution in a {@linkplain #millis() specified time period}. * * <p>If the test execution takes longer than the specified time period, then * the test is considered to have failed. * * <p>Note that the time period includes execution of the test method itself, * any {@linkplain Repeat repetitions} of the test, and any <em>set up</em> or * <em>tear down</em> of the test fixture. * * <p>This annotation may be used as a <em>meta-annotation</em> to create custom * <em>composed annotations</em>. * * @author Rod Johnson * @author Sam Brannen * @since 2.0 * @see org.springframework.test.annotation.Repeat * @see org.springframework.test.context.junit4.SpringJUnit4ClassRunner * @see org.springframework.test.context.junit4.rules.SpringMethodRule * @see org.springframework.test.context.junit4.statements.SpringFailOnTimeout * @deprecated since Spring Framework 7.0 in favor of the * {@link org.springframework.test.context.junit.jupiter.SpringExtension SpringExtension} * and JUnit Jupiter */ @Target({ElementType.METHOD, ElementType.ANNOTATION_TYPE}) @Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME) @Documented @Deprecated(since = "7.0") public @interface Timed { /** * The maximum amount of time (in milliseconds) that a test execution can * take without being marked as failed due to taking too long. */ long millis(); }

Loading feature diagnosis…

Source regions

Feature contributions

Feature contributions

FeatureValueContribution
(log-odds)
Source linesThe number of non-empty source lines.45+18
Halstead volumeHow much symbolic information the code contains. It combines the total number of operators and values with the number of distinct ones.445−14.685
Byte entropyHow varied the bytes in the source text are. Repeated bytes give a lower value; a more even mixture gives a higher value.4.832−7.247

Intercept 8.87 + feature contributions = 4.938 (log-odds).
Score = sigmoid(4.938) = 0.993.

Feature contributions

FeatureValueContribution
(log-odds)
Operator visual areaThe share of the code’s visual area occupied by operators such as +, =, and *.0.028+0.667
Comment layout (horizontal)How rapidly the visual pattern of comment characters changes from left to right.88.957+0.631
Comment layout frequencyHow frequently the layout switches between lines containing only comments or whitespace and lines containing code.46−0.592
Identifier layout (vertical)How rapidly the visual pattern of identifier characters changes from top to bottom.44.933+0.218
Indentation frequencyHow rapidly indentation changes from line to line.18−0.115
Identifier layout (horizontal)How rapidly the visual pattern of identifier characters changes from left to right. It measures spatial frequency, not the meaning of the names.88.935−0.102
Number layout frequencyHow rapidly the number of numeric values per line changes through the code.18+0.008

Intercept 0.07 + feature contributions = 0.786 (log-odds).
Score = sigmoid(0.786) = 0.687.

Score0.471
Score1
Run 1

The code demonstrates excellent readability. The package and imports are logically ordered. Javadoc is thorough yet clearly formatted with paragraph breaks and links. Annotations like @Target and @Retention are placed cleanly above the interface declaration. The single method 'millis()' is documented concisely, and the code is flat—no nesting or complex conditionals. Structure is minimal and purposeful, reflecting the nature of a simple annotation definition. Names are self-explanatory. While concise, the deprecation note is slightly long, but overall the code is very clear and easy to scan.

Run 2

The code is highly readable. It follows standard package/import organization, has clear Javadoc with useful context and deprecation guidance, and uses annotations concisely. The structure is logical, with no deep nesting. Each element serves a single purpose, and the method signature is minimal and explicit. Minor deductions: the large Javadoc block slightly increases length, but it provides necessary context. Overall, clarity and flow are excellent.

Run 3

This is an exemplary annotation definition. The code structure is logical with imports, comprehensive Javadoc, metadata annotations, and the interface declaration clearly separated. Nesting is minimal—there are no nested control structures. Intent is unmistakable: every element, from the @Target to the @Deprecated annotation, clearly communicates the purpose and lifecycle of the Timed annotation. The code is concise; no unnecessary methods or fields exist beyond the required millis() attribute. Action granularity is excellent, with each annotation and the method declaration on its own line. Reading flow is natural: package declaration, imports, detailed documentation, annotations, then the core element. The Javadoc is particularly strong, explaining use cases, interactions, and deprecation reasons thoroughly.

Run 1

Code Structure: Logically organized into imports, documentation, annotation metadata, and a single member. Nesting: Minimal, with no nested control flow. Clarity of intent: The Timed name, millis() member, and thorough Javadoc clearly explain the timeout, included lifecycle operations, and deprecation. Code length: The implementation is concise; documentation is longer but provides useful context. Action granularity: Each import, annotation, and declaration occupies its own line, making individual elements easy to identify. Reading flow: Natural top-to-bottom progression from purpose to configuration to the timeout value. A blank line between the package declaration and imports would slightly improve visual separation.

Run 2

Code Structure: Standard Java organization cleanly separates imports, documentation, annotation metadata, and the declaration. Nesting: Essentially flat, with only one member inside the annotation. Clarity of intent: The Timed name, millis() member, and detailed Javadoc clearly explain the timeout behavior, scope, and deprecation. Code length: Implementation is minimal; documentation is longer but provides useful context rather than unnecessary repetition. Action granularity: Each import, annotation, and member declaration occupies its own line. Reading flow: The progression from purpose and usage details to metadata and the time-limit member is natural. Minor formatting improvements, such as a blank line after the package declaration and removing the extra blank line before the closing brace, would make presentation slightly cleaner.

Run 3

Code Structure: Clean organization separates imports, documentation, annotation metadata, and the single member. Nesting: Essentially flat, with only the annotation declaration enclosing millis(). Clarity of intent: Timed and millis() clearly communicate the purpose, while Javadoc explains timeout scope, supported usage, and deprecation. Code length: Implementation is minimal; documentation is longer but provides useful context rather than unnecessary complexity. Action granularity: Each import, metadata annotation, and member declaration occupies its own line. Reading flow: Natural progression from package and dependencies to purpose, configuration, and timeout value. A blank line between the package declaration and imports would slightly improve visual separation.