Sample

int-4a5d5b04e6df-I07

Insert deterministic runtime-dead branches into callable bodies

Matched original source

Lines45

Scores

MethodScoreScale
Posnett0.9930–1; higher is more readable
Dorn0.6870–1; higher is more readable
Mi0.4710–1; higher is more readable
LLOC1Logical lines; fewer is more readable
DeepSeek V4 Pro18.330–20; mean of three runs
GPT-6.1 Sol190–20; mean of three runs
BTTF0.6860–1; higher is more readable

Views

Source code

package org.springframework.test.annotation; import java.lang.annotation.Documented; import java.lang.annotation.ElementType; import java.lang.annotation.Retention; import java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy; import java.lang.annotation.Target; /** * Test annotation for use with JUnit 4 to indicate that a test method has to finish * execution in a {@linkplain #millis() specified time period}. * * <p>If the test execution takes longer than the specified time period, then * the test is considered to have failed. * * <p>Note that the time period includes execution of the test method itself, * any {@linkplain Repeat repetitions} of the test, and any <em>set up</em> or * <em>tear down</em> of the test fixture. * * <p>This annotation may be used as a <em>meta-annotation</em> to create custom * <em>composed annotations</em>. * * @author Rod Johnson * @author Sam Brannen * @since 2.0 * @see org.springframework.test.annotation.Repeat * @see org.springframework.test.context.junit4.SpringJUnit4ClassRunner * @see org.springframework.test.context.junit4.rules.SpringMethodRule * @see org.springframework.test.context.junit4.statements.SpringFailOnTimeout * @deprecated since Spring Framework 7.0 in favor of the * {@link org.springframework.test.context.junit.jupiter.SpringExtension SpringExtension} * and JUnit Jupiter */ @Target({ElementType.METHOD, ElementType.ANNOTATION_TYPE}) @Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME) @Documented @Deprecated(since = "7.0") public @interface Timed { /** * The maximum amount of time (in milliseconds) that a test execution can * take without being marked as failed due to taking too long. */ long millis(); }

Loading feature diagnosis…

Source regions

Feature contributions

Feature contributions

FeatureValueContribution
(log-odds)
Source linesThe number of non-empty source lines.45+18
Halstead volumeHow much symbolic information the code contains. It combines the total number of operators and values with the number of distinct ones.445−14.685
Byte entropyHow varied the bytes in the source text are. Repeated bytes give a lower value; a more even mixture gives a higher value.4.832−7.247

Intercept 8.87 + feature contributions = 4.938 (log-odds).
Score = sigmoid(4.938) = 0.993.

Feature contributions

FeatureValueContribution
(log-odds)
Operator visual areaThe share of the code’s visual area occupied by operators such as +, =, and *.0.028+0.667
Comment layout (horizontal)How rapidly the visual pattern of comment characters changes from left to right.88.957+0.631
Comment layout frequencyHow frequently the layout switches between lines containing only comments or whitespace and lines containing code.46−0.592
Identifier layout (vertical)How rapidly the visual pattern of identifier characters changes from top to bottom.44.933+0.218
Indentation frequencyHow rapidly indentation changes from line to line.18−0.115
Identifier layout (horizontal)How rapidly the visual pattern of identifier characters changes from left to right. It measures spatial frequency, not the meaning of the names.88.935−0.102
Number layout frequencyHow rapidly the number of numeric values per line changes through the code.18+0.008

Intercept 0.07 + feature contributions = 0.786 (log-odds).
Score = sigmoid(0.786) = 0.687.

Score0.471
Score1
Run 1

The code demonstrates excellent readability. The package and imports are logically ordered. Javadoc is thorough yet clearly formatted with paragraph breaks and links. Annotations like @Target and @Retention are placed cleanly above the interface declaration. The single method 'millis()' is documented concisely, and the code is flat—no nesting or complex conditionals. Structure is minimal and purposeful, reflecting the nature of a simple annotation definition. Names are self-explanatory. While concise, the deprecation note is slightly long, but overall the code is very clear and easy to scan.

Run 2

This code is highly readable. The structure is logical, with imports, Javadoc, annotations, and the interface declaration clearly separated. Nesting is minimal, consisting only of the annotation declaration and its single method. The intent is unambiguous: it defines a deprecated test timing annotation with a required millis() attribute. Code length is appropriate, with concise imports and a single abstract method without unnecessary boilerplate. Each action—imports, target declaration, retention, deprecation, and method—appears on its own line. Reading flow is natural, moving from external dependencies through documentation to the declaration. The Javadoc is thorough but not excessive, explaining usage, deprecation, and related classes effectively.

Run 3

The code is a well-structured Java annotation definition with clear organization. It begins with necessary imports, followed by comprehensive Javadoc documentation explaining the annotation's purpose, constraints, and deprecation. The annotation target and retention policies are clearly specified using standard annotations. The single method 'millis()' is documented and has a clear purpose. The code is flat with no nesting, demonstrates clear intent through descriptive naming and documentation, and maintains concise length without unnecessary complexity. The reading flow is natural, with documentation smoothly leading into the annotation definition. The only minor consideration is the deprecation warning which adds slight complexity but is appropriately documented.

Run 1

Code Structure: Standard Java organization cleanly separates imports, documentation, annotation metadata, and the declaration. Nesting: Essentially flat, with only one member inside the annotation. Clarity of intent: Timed and millis() clearly express a test timeout, while Javadoc explains units, scope, and deprecation. Code length: Implementation is minimal; documentation is longer but relevant rather than redundant. Action granularity: Each import, metadata annotation, and member declaration occupies its own line, making individual elements easy to scan. Reading flow: The progression from purpose and usage details to metadata and the timeout member is natural. Minor formatting issues, such as the lack of a blank line after the package declaration and an extra blank line before the closing brace, slightly reduce polish.

Run 2

Code Structure: Logically organized into imports, documentation, annotation metadata, and a single member. Nesting: Essentially flat, with only the annotation declaration enclosing millis(). Clarity of intent: Timed and millis() communicate purpose clearly; Javadoc explains timing scope, failure behavior, and deprecation. Code length: The implementation is minimal, while the longer documentation provides useful context rather than unnecessary complexity. Action granularity: Each import, annotation, and member declaration occupies its own line. Reading flow: Natural top-to-bottom progression with consistent formatting. A blank line between the package declaration and imports would slightly improve visual separation.

Run 3

Code Structure: Logically organized into imports, documentation, annotation metadata, and a single member. Nesting: Essentially flat, with only the annotation declaration enclosing millis(). Clarity of intent: The Timed name, millis() member, and detailed documentation clearly explain timeout behavior, scope, and deprecation. Code length: The implementation is minimal; documentation is longer but useful rather than unnecessary. Action granularity: Each import, annotation, and declaration occupies its own line. Reading flow: Follows conventional Java ordering and reads naturally. Minor formatting issues, including no blank line after the package declaration and an extra blank line before the closing brace, slightly reduce polish.