Sample
int-b88b6a872300-I13
Lower every eligible classic and enhanced for loop to a while loop
Scores
| Method | Score | Scale |
|---|---|---|
| Posnett | 0 | 0–1; higher is more readable |
| Scalabrino | 0.918 | 0–1; higher is more readable |
| Dorn | 0.651 | 0–1; higher is more readable |
| Mi | 0.726 | 0–1; higher is more readable |
| LLOC | 28 | Logical lines; fewer is more readable |
| DeepSeek V4 Pro | 17.67 | 0–20; mean of three runs |
| GPT-6.1 Sol | 18 | 0–20; mean of three runs |
| BTTF | 0.599 | 0–1; higher is more readable |
Views
Loading feature diagnosis…
Source regions
Feature contributions
Feature contributions
| Feature | Value | Contribution (log-odds) |
|---|---|---|
| Halstead volumeHow much symbolic information the code contains. It combines the total number of operators and values with the number of distinct ones. | 2107.815 | −69.558 |
| Source linesThe number of non-empty source lines. | 114 | +45.6 |
| Byte entropyHow varied the bytes in the source text are. Repeated bytes give a lower value; a more even mixture gives a higher value. | 4.421 | −6.631 |
Intercept 8.87 + feature contributions = -21.719 (log-odds).
Score = sigmoid(-21.719) = 0.
| Score | 0.918 |
|---|
Feature contributions
| Feature | Value | Contribution (log-odds) |
|---|---|---|
| Comment layout frequencyHow frequently the layout switches between lines containing only comments or whitespace and lines containing code. | 115 | −3.035 |
| Indentation frequencyHow rapidly indentation changes from line to line. | 73 | +1.788 |
| Identifier layout (horizontal)How rapidly the visual pattern of identifier characters changes from left to right. It measures spatial frequency, not the meaning of the names. | 120.991 | −1.46 |
| Identifier layout (vertical)How rapidly the visual pattern of identifier characters changes from top to bottom. | 113.861 | +1.182 |
| Comment layout (horizontal)How rapidly the visual pattern of comment characters changes from left to right. | 120.991 | +1.148 |
| Operator visual areaThe share of the code’s visual area occupied by operators such as +, =, and *. | 0.042 | +0.535 |
| Number layout frequencyHow rapidly the number of numeric values per line changes through the code. | 1 | +0.398 |
Intercept 0.07 + feature contributions = 0.625 (log-odds).
Score = sigmoid(0.625) = 0.651.
| Score | 0.726 |
|---|
| Score | 28 |
|---|
Run 1
The code is highly readable with clear structure and intent. It is a well-documented interface with logical organization of methods, flat nesting levels, and natural reading flow. Each method has a single purpose and concise implementation. The waitForFuture method demonstrates clean handling of timeout logic with minimal nesting. Documentation is thorough without being excessive, explaining both purpose and edge cases. Minor deductions for slight verbosity in some comments and the multi-line method signature in waitForFuture.
Run 2
The code is a clean, well-organized interface with clear purpose and consistent style. Structure is logical, with constants, abstract methods, and default methods grouped coherently. Nesting is minimal; the only nested blocks are in waitObject and waitForFuture, both kept flat and readable. Intent is explicit through clear method names and thorough Javadoc comments. Code length is concise for the functionality provided, avoiding unnecessary verbosity. Action granularity is appropriate, with one logical operation per line in most cases. Reading flow follows a natural top-down progression: basic time methods, then waiting/timer utilities. Minor deductions could be made for the slightly awkward line break in the waitForFuture signature and the fully-qualified exception reference, but overall readability is excellent.
Run 3
The code is well-structured and readable. It clearly separates interface methods, uses concise Javadoc comments to explain intent, and follows a logical order: core time methods, utility methods, then future handling. Nesting is moderate—waitObject and waitForFuture use loops but remain understandable. Action granularity is mostly one action per line, though some lines like 'throw new org.apache.kafka.common.errors.TimeoutException(...)' are long but justified. Reading flow is natural. Minor issues: the long fully-qualified exception name adds clutter, and default method implementations could benefit from more whitespace or helper methods. Overall, the code balances clarity and conciseness effectively.
Run 1
Code Structure: The interface logically groups clock access, waiting, and timer creation into small, focused methods. Nesting: Most methods are flat; waitObject adds moderate nesting through synchronization, a loop, and conditionals, but remains easy to follow. Clarity of intent: Descriptive names and thorough documentation clearly distinguish wall-clock and monotonic time. The reason for retrying future.get after a timeout could use a short comment. Code length: Implementations are concise, with documentation contributing useful context rather than unnecessary code. Action granularity: Each statement generally performs one action, with no crowded multi-statement lines. Reading flow: Consistent formatting and straightforward control flow make reading natural. Minor distractions include inconsistent brace usage, the multiline waitForFuture signature, and the fully qualified timeout exception needed to distinguish two exception types.
Run 2
Code Structure: The interface logically groups clock access, waiting, and timer creation into focused methods. Nesting: Most methods are flat; waitObject has moderate synchronization/loop/conditional nesting, while waitForFuture remains manageable. Clarity of intent: Descriptive names, explicit time-unit suffixes, and useful Javadoc clearly communicate behavior. The retained timeout exception and retry loop could benefit from a brief explanation. Code length: Implementations are concise; lengthy documentation is mostly justified by subtle timing semantics. Action granularity: Statements generally perform one action per line, though the conditional throw expression is slightly denser. Reading flow: Method organization and consistent spacing support natural reading, with minor distractions from inconsistent brace usage, multiline parameter formatting, and the fully qualified timeout exception.
Run 3
Code Structure: The interface is logically organized into clock access, sleeping, condition waiting, timer creation, and future waiting. Nesting: Most methods are flat; waitObject adds moderate nesting through synchronization, a loop, and conditionals. Clarity of intent: Descriptive method names, unit-specific variables, and detailed documentation make purposes clear, though the retained timeout exception and retry loop require some interpretation. Code length: Implementations are concise, with documentation adding useful context rather than unnecessary bulk. Action granularity: Statements generally perform one action per line; the conditional exception expression is slightly denser. Reading flow: Consistent formatting and focused methods support natural reading, with minor distractions from brace-free conditionals, the fully qualified timeout exception, and the unusually split waitForFuture signature.