E22 · Buse/20
Scores
| Method | Score | Scale | Dataset rank (0–100) |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-6.1 Sol | 19 | 0–20; mean of three runs | 96.0Δ 51.0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Pro | 18 | 0–20; mean of three runs | 98.5Δ 53.5 |
| BTTF | 0.418 | 0–1; higher is more readable | 26.3Δ 18.7 |
| Human | 3.26 | 1–5; original rating | 44.9 |
Loading feature diagnosis…
GPT-6.1 Sol explanations
Run 1 · 19/20
Code Structure: Logically organizes event ID selection, event creation, and dispatch.
Nesting: Flat, with no nested blocks.
Clarity of intent: Descriptive names and the "blink" command make the purpose clear, though ON/OFF definitions require external context.
Code length: Concise, with no unnecessary statements.
Action granularity: Each line performs one distinct action.
Reading flow: Natural progression from determining state to constructing and firing the event. Minor spacing inconsistencies around the ternary operator and constructor arguments slightly reduce polish.
Run 2 · 19/20
Code Structure: Logically organized into choosing an event ID, constructing an event, and firing it.
Nesting: Flat, with no nested control flow.
Clarity of intent: Descriptive variable names and the "blink" command make the purpose clear, though ON and OFF depend on surrounding context.
Code length: Concise without unnecessary statements.
Action granularity: Each line performs one distinct action.
Reading flow: Natural progression from preparation to dispatch; minor spacing inconsistencies around the ternary operator and constructor arguments slightly reduce polish.
Run 3 · 19/20
Code Structure: Logically organized into event ID selection, event creation, and dispatch.
Nesting: Flat, with no nested control flow.
Clarity of intent: Variable names and the "blink" command clearly indicate the purpose, although ON and OFF depend on external definitions.
Code length: Concise without unnecessary steps.
Action granularity: Each line performs one distinct action.
Reading flow: Natural progression from determining state to constructing and firing the event. Minor spacing inconsistencies around the ternary operator and constructor arguments slightly reduce readability.
DeepSeek V4 Pro explanations
Run 1 · 18/20
The code is highly readable. It has a clear logical structure: initialize an event ID, create an event object, and fire the event. Nesting is non-existent, keeping the flow flat and straightforward. The intent is clear—triggering a blink action event—though using a ternary for eventId adds minor ambiguity without context. The length is concise with no unnecessary lines. Each action is on its own line, respecting action granularity. The reading flow is natural and sequential.
Run 2 · 18/20
The code is highly readable. It has a clear, logical structure with an obvious purpose: preparing and firing an action event. Nesting is absent, and clarity of intent is strong, using descriptive variable names like eventId and blinkEvent. The code is concise and not unnecessarily long. Action granularity is good, with one main action per line, and the reading flow is natural—determine the event ID, construct the event, then fire it. Minor deductions for the ternary expression, which slightly compresses two actions into one line, and the ambiguous strings 'blink', 'ON', and 'OFF' that rely on external definitions or comments for full context.
Run 3 · 18/20
The code is highly readable. It has a clear, flat structure with no nesting. Intent is immediately apparent: construct an event ID based on a boolean condition, create an ActionEvent with a descriptive label, and dispatch it. Each line performs a single logical action. The variable names are descriptive, and the ternary operator is used appropriately to keep the code concise. Only minor improvements might include adding a comment for context or using a more descriptive variable name than 'blinkEvent', but overall the code is very clean and maintainable.
BTTF feature contributions
Score 0.418 / 1